Literature DB >> 10086822

Evaluation of diagnostic imaging tests: diagnostic probability estimation.

O S Miettinen1, C I Henschke, D F Yankelevitz.   

Abstract

In the evaluation of a diagnostic imaging test for the diagnosis of a particular illness in a particular category of patients, the test should be construed as leading to a test result in the sense of a set of descriptive readings from the image(s), not interpretation of these; and in the evaluation of the test, therefore, the first challenge is the translation of each test result (set of readings) into the corresponding probability that the illness is present. This interpretive translation should not be subjective, nor should it be based on an objective algorithm founded on clinical judgments. Instead, a suitable diagnostic probability function (of the elements in the test result) should be derived empirically by logistic regression analysis of suitable data. We illustrate this alternative outlook by reanalysis of the data from the Prospective Investigation of Pulmonary Embolism Diagnosis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 10086822     DOI: 10.1016/s0895-4356(98)00127-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol        ISSN: 0895-4356            Impact factor:   6.437


  7 in total

1.  Communicating accuracy of tests to general practitioners: a controlled study.

Authors:  Johann Steurer; Joachim E Fischer; Lucas M Bachmann; Michael Koller; Gerben ter Riet
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2002-04-06

2.  The modern scientific physician: 4. The useful property of a diagnostic.

Authors:  O S Miettinen
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2001-10-02       Impact factor: 8.262

3.  The modern scientific physician: 3. Scientific diagnosis.

Authors:  O S Miettinen
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2001-09-18       Impact factor: 8.262

4.  Epidemiology: indeed "quo vadis"?

Authors:  Jacobus Lubsen
Journal:  Eur J Epidemiol       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 8.082

5.  Sialometry and sialochemistry: a non-invasive approach for diagnosing Sjögren's syndrome.

Authors:  W W I Kalk; A Vissink; B Stegenga; H Bootsma; A V Nieuw Amerongen; C G M Kallenberg
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 19.103

6.  A Clinician's Guide to Artificial Intelligence: How to Critically Appraise Machine Learning Studies.

Authors:  Livia Faes; Xiaoxuan Liu; Siegfried K Wagner; Dun Jack Fu; Konstantinos Balaskas; Dawn A Sim; Lucas M Bachmann; Pearse A Keane; Alastair K Denniston
Journal:  Transl Vis Sci Technol       Date:  2020-02-12       Impact factor: 3.283

7.  Optimizing the diagnostic work-up of acute uncomplicated urinary tract infections.

Authors:  Bart J Knottnerus; Patrick J E Bindels; Suzanne E Geerlings; Eric P Moll van Charante; Gerben ter Riet
Journal:  BMC Fam Pract       Date:  2008-12-08       Impact factor: 2.497

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.