OBJECTIVE: The prevalence of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) was randomly investigated among Dutch and Belgian intellectually disabled individuals. METHODS: In six institutes including 1607 residents, 435 persons with IQ <50 underwent 24-h esophageal pH-metry and were scored for possible predisposing factors and characteristic reflux symptoms. In 49 (11.2%) cases the test failed because of technical reasons. A pathological pH test was defined as a pH <4 for >4.5% of the measured time. Subjects with a pathological pH test (patients) were compared with those with a normal pH test (controls). RESULTS: Of the remaining individuals, 51.8% (200/386) showed a normal pH test, whereas 186 showed a pathological pH test (median duration pH <4: 14.2%, range: 4.5-78.4%). As possible predisposing factors scoliosis, cerebral palsy, use of anticonvulsant drugs or other benzodiazepines, and IQ <35 were found, whereas symptoms such as vomiting, hematemesis, rumination, and depressive symptoms were indicative for reflux. At endoscopy reflux esophagitis was diagnosed in 129 of the 186 patients (69.4%). In 61 (47.3%) of 129 patients, grade I, 43 (33.3%) grade II, 25 (19.4%) grade III/IV (Savary-Miller) were found. Barrett's esophagus was found in 18 (14.0%) and peptic strictures in five (3.9%) cases. CONCLUSIONS: An abnormal 24-h pH-metry and symptoms suggestive for GERD were documented frequently in a large cohort of institutionalized intellectually disabled individuals. Further endoscopical evaluation confirmed the diagnosis of reflux esophagitis in the majority of these individuals.
OBJECTIVE: The prevalence of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) was randomly investigated among Dutch and Belgian intellectually disabled individuals. METHODS: In six institutes including 1607 residents, 435 persons with IQ <50 underwent 24-h esophageal pH-metry and were scored for possible predisposing factors and characteristic reflux symptoms. In 49 (11.2%) cases the test failed because of technical reasons. A pathological pH test was defined as a pH <4 for >4.5% of the measured time. Subjects with a pathological pH test (patients) were compared with those with a normal pH test (controls). RESULTS: Of the remaining individuals, 51.8% (200/386) showed a normal pH test, whereas 186 showed a pathological pH test (median duration pH <4: 14.2%, range: 4.5-78.4%). As possible predisposing factors scoliosis, cerebral palsy, use of anticonvulsant drugs or other benzodiazepines, and IQ <35 were found, whereas symptoms such as vomiting, hematemesis, rumination, and depressive symptoms were indicative for reflux. At endoscopy reflux esophagitis was diagnosed in 129 of the 186 patients (69.4%). In 61 (47.3%) of 129 patients, grade I, 43 (33.3%) grade II, 25 (19.4%) grade III/IV (Savary-Miller) were found. Barrett's esophagus was found in 18 (14.0%) and peptic strictures in five (3.9%) cases. CONCLUSIONS: An abnormal 24-h pH-metry and symptoms suggestive for GERD were documented frequently in a large cohort of institutionalized intellectually disabled individuals. Further endoscopical evaluation confirmed the diagnosis of reflux esophagitis in the majority of these individuals.
Authors: R Martínez-Leal; L Salvador-Carulla; C Linehan; P Walsh; G Weber; G Van Hove; T Määttä; B Azema; M Haveman; S Buono; A Germanavicius; H van Schrojenstein Lantman-de Valk; J Tossebro; A Carmen-Câra; D Moravec Berger; J Perry; M Kerr Journal: J Intellect Disabil Res Date: 2011-07-05
Authors: Anke J E de Veer; Judith T Bos; Riet C Niezen-de Boer; Clarisse J M Böhmer; Anneke L Francke Journal: BMC Gastroenterol Date: 2008-06-11 Impact factor: 3.067
Authors: Sally-Ann Cooper; Gary McLean; Bruce Guthrie; Alex McConnachie; Stewart Mercer; Frank Sullivan; Jill Morrison Journal: BMC Fam Pract Date: 2015-08-27 Impact factor: 2.497