Literature DB >> 10086054

Bladder augmentation. Options, outcomes, future.

R C Rink1.   

Abstract

Remarkable progress has been made in lower urinary tract reconstruction in children. Nowhere is this more valuable than in augmentation cystoplasty, where there are several available options. This article discusses the current techniques and the benefits and limitations of these procedures. A section on tissue regeneration techniques and the author's current recommendations are included.

Entities:  

Mesh：

Year:  1999        PMID： 10086054     DOI： 10.1016/s0094-0143(99)80010-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urol Clin North Am        ISSN： 0094-0143            Impact factor:   2.241


  4 in total

1.  The use of mesenchymal stem cells in bladder augmentation.

Authors:  Mila Torii Corrêa Leite; Luiz G Freitas-Filho; Andréia Silva Oliveira; Patrícia Semedo-Kuriki; Marcus Laks; Victor Eduardo Arrua Arias; Pedro S Peixoto
Journal:  Pediatr Surg Int       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 1.827

2.  Five-year cost analysis of intra-detrusor injection of botulinum toxin type A and augmentation cystoplasty for refractory neurogenic detrusor overactivity.

Authors:  Priya Padmanabhan; Harriette M Scarpero; Douglas F Milam; Roger R Dmochowski; David F Penson
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2010-11-26       Impact factor: 4.226

3.  Giant Vesical Calculus Formation as a Complication of Augmentation Cystoplasty.

Authors:  Manoj Kumar; Ranjeet Kumar Singh; Rakesh Kapoor
Journal:  Indian J Surg       Date:  2015-11-12       Impact factor: 0.656

4.  Spinal dysraphism: a neurosurgical review for the urologist.

Authors:  José Murillo B Netto; André N Bastos; André A Figueiredo; Luis M Pérez
Journal:  Rev Urol       Date:  2009
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.