Literature DB >> 10084628

An inter-regional comparison: fatal crashes in the southeastern and non-southeastern United States: preliminary findings.

S Washington1, J Metarko, I Fomunung, R Ross, F Julian, E Moran.   

Abstract

The southeastern United States, particularly those states representing the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration's and Federal Highway Administration's Region IV, have consistently had among the highest number of fatal crashes and fatal crash rates compared to the other five regions in the US. These states--Alabama, Florida, Georgia, Kentucky, Mississippi, North Carolina, South Carolina, and Tennessee, are suspected of sharing traits in common that lead to their systematically poor crash record. Inter-regional and intra-regional comparisons, such as the comparison between southeastern and non-southeastern states, raises interesting and challenging research questions that are applicable to similar comparisons. First, is there a sound practical and theoretical justification supporting an inter-regional comparison framework? Second, is there a way to construct a meaningful statistical hypothesis and test to determine whether one region, which is comprised of numerous entities, suffers from a characteristically better or worse crash record? This paper addresses each of these questions. After providing a brief summary of the Southeast's safety record, we discuss the issues pro and con surrounding inter-regional comparisons, illustrating the statistical strategy for such an analysis approach. Then, a simple generalizable statistical procedure is used for testing the hypothesis that southeastern states have a poorer crash record than non-southeastern states. Finally, we explore possible relationships between safety belt use, roadway functional class, vehicle miles of travel, and driver age on fatal crash occurrence. The data used in the analyses are from the Fatal Analysis Reporting System (FARS), primarily data compiled for 1995. The analysis suggests that regional differences in fatal crashes may indeed exist, that these differences are related in part to seat-belt use, VMT by functional classification, and speed limit differences, and that more detailed studies are needed to quantify the effect of these and other factors. The approach developed here lends insight as to where future in-depth studies may reveal causal factors of fatal crashes, and illustrates the relative safety performance records of US regions.

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10084628     DOI: 10.1016/s0001-4575(98)00055-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Accid Anal Prev        ISSN: 0001-4575


  7 in total

1.  Geographic distribution of trauma centers and injury-related mortality in the United States.

Authors:  Joshua B Brown; Matthew R Rosengart; Timothy R Billiar; Andrew B Peitzman; Jason L Sperry
Journal:  J Trauma Acute Care Surg       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 3.313

2.  Geographic Variation in Outcome Benefits of Helicopter Transport for Trauma in the United States: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

Authors:  Joshua B Brown; Mark L Gestring; Nicole A Stassen; Raquel M Forsythe; Timothy R Billiar; Andrew B Peitzman; Jason L Sperry
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 12.969

3.  Evaluating adverse rural crash outcomes using the NHTSA State Data System.

Authors:  Christine Peura; Joseph A Kilch; David E Clark
Journal:  Accid Anal Prev       Date:  2015-06-24

4.  Explaining regional disparities in traffic mortality by decomposing conditional probabilities.

Authors:  Gregory P Goldstein; David E Clark; Lori L Travis; Amy E Haskins
Journal:  Inj Prev       Date:  2011-01-06       Impact factor: 2.399

5.  Mortality in rural locations after severe injuries from motor vehicle crashes.

Authors:  Lori L Travis; David E Clark; Amy E Haskins; Joseph A Kilch
Journal:  J Safety Res       Date:  2012-10-24

Review 6.  Current Understanding of the Effects of Congestion on Traffic Accidents.

Authors:  Angus Eugene Retallack; Bertram Ostendorf
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2019-09-13       Impact factor: 3.390

7.  Relationship Between Traffic Volume and Accident Frequency at Intersections.

Authors:  Angus Eugene Retallack; Bertram Ostendorf
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-02-21       Impact factor: 3.390

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.