Literature DB >> 10084536

Global aphasia without hemiparesis: language profiles and lesion distribution.

R E Hanlon1, W E Lux, A W Dromerick.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Global aphasia without hemiparesis (GAWH) is an uncommon stroke syndrome involving receptive and expressive language impairment, without the hemiparesis typically manifested by patients with global aphasia after large left perisylvian lesions. A few cases of GAWH have been reported with conflicting conclusions regarding pathogenesis, lesion localisation, and recovery. The current study was conducted to attempt to clarify these issues.
METHODS: Ten cases of GAWH were prospectively studied with language profiles and lesion analysis; five patients had multiple lesions, four patients had a single lesion, and one had a subarachnoid haemorrhage. Eight patients met criteria for cardioembolic ischaemic stroke.
RESULTS: Cluster analysis based on acute language profiles disclosed three subtypes of patients with GAWH; these clusters persisted on follow up language assessment. Each cluster evolved into a different aphasia subtype: persistent GAWH, Wernicke's aphasia, or transcortical motor aphasia (TCM). Composite lesion analysis showed that persistent GAWH was related to lesioning of the left superior temporal gyrus. Patients with acute GAWH who evolved into TCM type aphasia had common lesioning of the left inferior frontal gyrus and adjacent subcortical white matter. Patients with acute GAWH who evolved into Wernicke's type aphasia were characterised by lesioning of the left precentral and postcentral gyri. Recovery of language was poor in all but one patient.
CONCLUSIONS: Although patients with acute GAWH are similar on neurological examination, they are heterogeneous with respect to early aphasia profile, language recovery, and lesion profile.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10084536      PMCID: PMC1736239          DOI: 10.1136/jnnp.66.3.365

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry        ISSN: 0022-3050            Impact factor:   10.154


  12 in total

Review 1.  Aphasia.

Authors:  A R Damasio
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1992-02-20       Impact factor: 91.245

2.  Unexpected CT-scan findings in global aphasia.

Authors:  L A Vignolo; E Boccardi; L Caverni
Journal:  Cortex       Date:  1986-03       Impact factor: 4.027

3.  Global aphasia without other lateralizing signs.

Authors:  J Bogousslavsky
Journal:  Arch Neurol       Date:  1988-02

4.  Measurements of acute cerebral infarction: a clinical examination scale.

Authors:  T Brott; H P Adams; C P Olinger; J R Marler; W G Barsan; J Biller; J Spilker; R Holleran; R Eberle; V Hertzberg
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  1989-07       Impact factor: 7.914

5.  Global aphasia without hemiparesis following prerolandic infarction.

Authors:  J Deleval; A Leonard; N Mavroudakis; G Rodesch
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  1989-11       Impact factor: 9.910

6.  Global aphasia without hemiparesis: a sign of embolic encephalopathy.

Authors:  G Van Horn; A Hawes
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  1982-04       Impact factor: 9.910

7.  Global aphasia without hemiparesis.

Authors:  J M Ferro
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  1983-08       Impact factor: 9.910

Review 8.  Global aphasia due to thalamic hemorrhage: a case report and review of the literature.

Authors:  R Kumar; A K Masih; J Pardo
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  1996-12       Impact factor: 3.966

9.  Global aphasia without hemiparesis: multiple etiologies.

Authors:  A D Legatt; M J Rubin; L R Kaplan; E B Healton; J C Brust
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  1987-02       Impact factor: 9.910

10.  Global aphasia without hemiparesis.

Authors:  D Tranel; J Biller; H Damasio; H P Adams; S H Cornell
Journal:  Arch Neurol       Date:  1987-03
View more
  10 in total

1.  Global Aphasia without Hemiparesis: A neuroradiologic correlation.

Authors:  Ramachandiran Nandhagopal
Journal:  Sultan Qaboos Univ Med J       Date:  2012-02-07

Review 2.  Infarct topography and functional outcomes.

Authors:  Mark R Etherton; Natalia S Rost; Ona Wu
Journal:  J Cereb Blood Flow Metab       Date:  2017-03-27       Impact factor: 6.200

3.  Crossed Aphasia in a Patient with Anaplastic Astrocytoma of the Non-Dominant Hemisphere.

Authors:  Stephanie Prater; Neil Anand; Lawrence Wei; Neil Horner
Journal:  J Radiol Case Rep       Date:  2017-09-30

Review 4.  Predictors of Therapy Response in Chronic Aphasia: Building a Foundation for Personalized Aphasia Therapy.

Authors:  Sigfus Kristinsson; Dirk B den Ouden; Chris Rorden; Roger Newman-Norlund; Jean Neils-Strunjas; Julius Fridriksson
Journal:  J Stroke       Date:  2022-05-31       Impact factor: 8.632

Review 5.  Language recovery following stroke.

Authors:  Adam Gerstenecker; Ronald M Lazar
Journal:  Clin Neuropsychol       Date:  2019-01-30       Impact factor: 3.535

6.  Global aphasia without hemiparesis: A case series.

Authors:  Aparna R Pai; Gopee Krishnan; S Prashanth; Suryanarayana Rao
Journal:  Ann Indian Acad Neurol       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 1.383

7.  Lesion localization of global aphasia without hemiparesis by overlapping of the brain magnetic resonance images.

Authors:  Woo Jin Kim; Nam-Jong Paik
Journal:  Neural Regen Res       Date:  2014-12-01       Impact factor: 5.135

8.  Aphasia as the Initial Presentation of Acute Otomastoiditis in an Elderly Male.

Authors:  Sherif T Abuserewa; Mohamed Faris; Thaddeus Golden
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2021-04-05

9.  Shifting of global aphasia to Wernicke's aphasia in a patient with intact motor function: a case report.

Authors:  Ya-Chi Chuang; Chuan-Ching Liu; I-Ching Yu; Yu-Lin Tsai; Shin-Tsu Chang
Journal:  BMC Neurol       Date:  2021-03-11       Impact factor: 2.474

10.  The Effectiveness of Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (TMS) Paradigms as Treatment Options for Recovery of Language Deficits in Chronic Poststroke Aphasia.

Authors:  Anastasios M Georgiou; Maria Kambanaros
Journal:  Behav Neurol       Date:  2022-01-11       Impact factor: 3.342

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.