Literature DB >> 10083755

Comparative vector competence of Dermacentor variabilis and Ixodes scapularis (Acari: Ixodidae) for the agent of human granulocytic ehrlichiosis.

F Des Vignes1, M L Levin, D Fish.   

Abstract

Vector competence of Ixodes scapularis Say and Dermacentor variabilis Say for the agent of human granulocytic ehrlichiosis (HGE) was compared. Five white-footed mice, Peromyscus leucopus Rafinesque, were inoculated intra-peritoneally with blood from a mouse infected with the agent of HGE. Approximately 100 I. scapularis and D. variabilis larvae were placed on each mouse and allowed to feed to repletion. Fed larvae were collected, separated according to species and allowed to molt to nymphs. Twenty-six per cent of I. scapularis (34/131) and 11% of D. variabilis (11/96) tested positive for the agent of HGE by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) after molting to nymphs. Positive I. scapularis nymphs transmitted the agent of HGE to P. leucopus mice in 5 of 5 trials. In contrast, the positive D. variabilis nymphs did not transmit the agent of agent of HGE in any of 6 trials. In a 2nd experiment, 3 P. leucopus mice were infested with I. scapularis nymphs that were infected with the agent of HGE. All 3 mice became infected with the agent of HGE and approximately 300 D. variabilis larvae were placed on each mouse and allowed to feed to repletion. Larvae were collected and allowed to molt to nymphs as before. Approximately 8% (5/60) of the nymphs became positive for the agent of HGE as determined by PCR. Twenty-five of these nymphs were then placed on each of 9 P. leucopus mice and allowed to feed to repletion. Evidence of transmission was not observed in any of 9 mice exposed to D. variabilis nymphs. These results demonstrate that although I. scapularis is a competent vector of the agent of the HGF, D. variabilis is not.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10083755     DOI: 10.1093/jmedent/36.2.182

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Entomol        ISSN: 0022-2585            Impact factor:   2.278


  8 in total

Review 1.  Coinfections acquired from ixodes ticks.

Authors:  Stephen J Swanson; David Neitzel; Kurt D Reed; Edward A Belongia
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 26.132

2.  Immunity reduces reservoir host competence of Peromyscus leucopus for Ehrlichia phagocytophila.

Authors:  M L Levin; D Fish
Journal:  Infect Immun       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 3.441

3.  Acquisition of coinfection and simultaneous transmission of Borrelia burgdorferi and Ehrlichia phagocytophila by Ixodes scapularis ticks.

Authors:  M L Levin; D Fish
Journal:  Infect Immun       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 3.441

Review 4.  Ehrlichia chaffeensis: a prototypical emerging pathogen.

Authors:  Christopher D Paddock; James E Childs
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 26.132

Review 5.  Anaplasma phagocytophilum--a widespread multi-host pathogen with highly adaptive strategies.

Authors:  Snorre Stuen; Erik G Granquist; Cornelia Silaghi
Journal:  Front Cell Infect Microbiol       Date:  2013-07-22       Impact factor: 5.293

Review 6.  Epidemiological and Clinicopathological Features of Anaplasma phagocytophilum Infection in Dogs: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Sarah El Hamiani Khatat; Sylvie Daminet; Luc Duchateau; Latifa Elhachimi; Malika Kachani; Hamid Sahibi
Journal:  Front Vet Sci       Date:  2021-06-23

Review 7.  Opening the black box of Anaplasma phagocytophilum diversity: current situation and future perspectives.

Authors:  Thibaud Dugat; Anne-Claire Lagrée; Renaud Maillard; Henri-Jean Boulouis; Nadia Haddad
Journal:  Front Cell Infect Microbiol       Date:  2015-08-14       Impact factor: 5.293

Review 8.  Research on the ecology of ticks and tick-borne pathogens--methodological principles and caveats.

Authors:  Agustín Estrada-Peña; Jeremy S Gray; Olaf Kahl; Robert S Lane; Ard M Nijhof
Journal:  Front Cell Infect Microbiol       Date:  2013-08-08       Impact factor: 5.293

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.