OBJECTIVE: Following revision of the international standard classification (ISCO88), to update and validate on health data an occupationally derived indicator of socio-economic status (SES) adapted to changing occupational and demographic conditions. METHOD: The development of the New Zealand Socioeconomic Index (NZSEI) is based on a 'returns to human capital' model of the stratification process and uses data from the 1991 New Zealand Census (n = 1,051, 926) to generate scores for 97 occupational groups. The construct validation of the scale is carried out on data from the 1992-93 nationwide Household Health Survey (n = 3,000) using three health indicators (self-assessed health, cigarette smoking, general practitioner visits). RESULTS: In general, the results are consistent with expected socio-economic patterns drawn from the literature for the three indicators. CONCLUSIONS: While further work is required on a number of methodological and conceptual issues, the NZSEI provides a robust, standardised and internationally comparable occupational scale of SES for both males and females in either full- or part-time employment. IMPLICATIONS: The NZSEI can be used on routinely collected occupational data. It has a clear conceptual rationale, updates existing SES scales, and provides a link to international standards in SES and occupational classification.
OBJECTIVE: Following revision of the international standard classification (ISCO88), to update and validate on health data an occupationally derived indicator of socio-economic status (SES) adapted to changing occupational and demographic conditions. METHOD: The development of the New Zealand Socioeconomic Index (NZSEI) is based on a 'returns to human capital' model of the stratification process and uses data from the 1991 New Zealand Census (n = 1,051, 926) to generate scores for 97 occupational groups. The construct validation of the scale is carried out on data from the 1992-93 nationwide Household Health Survey (n = 3,000) using three health indicators (self-assessed health, cigarette smoking, general practitioner visits). RESULTS: In general, the results are consistent with expected socio-economic patterns drawn from the literature for the three indicators. CONCLUSIONS: While further work is required on a number of methodological and conceptual issues, the NZSEI provides a robust, standardised and internationally comparable occupational scale of SES for both males and females in either full- or part-time employment. IMPLICATIONS: The NZSEI can be used on routinely collected occupational data. It has a clear conceptual rationale, updates existing SES scales, and provides a link to international standards in SES and occupational classification.
Authors: S N Ameratunga; R N Norton; G Whitlock; S Macmahon; C Coggan; R T Jackson; J D Langley; V Parag; D Smith; D G Woodfield Journal: Inj Prev Date: 2002-03 Impact factor: 2.399
Authors: David McLean; Andrea 't Mannetje; Evan Dryson; Chris Walls; Fiona McKenzie; Milena Maule; Soo Cheng; Chris Cunningham; Hans Kromhout; Paolo Boffetta; Aaron Blair; Neil Pearce Journal: Int J Epidemiol Date: 2008-10-25 Impact factor: 7.196
Authors: Rebecca L Wilson; Alison J Leviton; Shalem Y Leemaqz; Paul H Anderson; Jessica A Grieger; Luke E Grzeskowiak; Petra E Verburg; Lesley McCowan; Gustaaf A Dekker; Tina Bianco-Miotto; Claire T Roberts Journal: BMC Pregnancy Childbirth Date: 2018-06-20 Impact factor: 3.007
Authors: Ang Zhou; Gustaaf A Dekker; Eugenie R Lumbers; Shalem Y Leemaqz; Steven D Thompson; Gary Heinemann; Lesley M E McCowan; Claire T Roberts Journal: Mol Hum Reprod Date: 2013-04-23 Impact factor: 4.025
Authors: Eva R van der Vlugt; Petra E Verburg; Shalem Y Leemaqz; Lesley M E McCowan; Lucilla Poston; Louise C Kenny; Jenny Myers; James J Walker; Gustaaf A Dekker; Claire T Roberts Journal: Biol Sex Differ Date: 2020-05-05 Impact factor: 5.027