Literature DB >> 10081883

Suprameatal transvaginal urethrolysis.

S P Petrou1, J A Brown, J G Blaivas.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: We describe and assess a method of urethrolysis using a transvaginal suprameatal approach without lateral perforation of the urethropelvic ligament.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between March 1993 and December 1997, 32 consecutive women 32 to 79 years old underwent suprameatal transvaginal urethrolysis at 2 institutions. In all cases anti-incontinence surgery was done previously, including a pubovaginal sling procedure in 12, Marshall-Marchetti-Krantz procedure in 8, Burch colposuspension in 6, modified Pereyra transvaginal urethropexy in 4, and Gittes suspension and anterior repair in 1 each. Of the 32 patients 20 were in urinary retention and 12 had primarily urge and/or irritative voiding symptoms, or urge incontinence. In the patients in urinary retention average maximal detrusor pressure was 41.4 cm. water. In all cases physical examination, cystourethroscopy and video urodynamics were done before suprameatal transvaginal urethrolysis. Obstruction was defined as detrusor pressure greater than 20 cm. water at maximum urinary flow of less than 12 ml. per second. Urethral obstruction was presumed when examination revealed urethral angulation, tethering, narrowing or scarification. Impaired detrusor contractility was diagnosed when detrusor pressure at maximum urinary flow was less than 20 cm. water at maximum urinary flow of less than 12 ml. per second.
RESULTS: After suprameatal transvaginal urethrolysis 13 of the 20 women (65%) in urinary retention voided well and in 8 of the 12 (67%) with urgency symptoms resolved. Postoperative stress urinary incontinence developed in only 1 case.
CONCLUSIONS: The success rate of suprameatal transvaginal urethrolysis to treat urinary obstruction associated with anti-incontinence procedures compares favorably to that of other described alternative approaches. The success rate in patients with definite urodynamic criteria for obstruction was not significantly better than in those who underwent suprameatal transvaginal urethrolysis based on physical examination and clinical judgment. Preoperative maximal urinary flow rate was associated with operative success (p = 0.018), while preoperative post-void residual urine and maximum detrusor pressure failed to reveal a difference between operative success and failure.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10081883

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Urol        ISSN: 0022-5347            Impact factor:   7.450


  17 in total

Review 1.  Iatrogenic obstruction after sling surgery.

Authors:  Bhavin N Patel; Kathleen C Kobashi; David Staskin
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2012-06-05       Impact factor: 14.432

Review 2.  Bladder outlet obstruction in women: prevalence, recognition, and management.

Authors:  R Patel; V Nitti
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 3.092

Review 3.  Voiding dysfunction after surgery for stress incontinence: literature review and survey results.

Authors:  James S Dunn; Alfred E Bent; R Mark Ellerkman; Mikio A Nihira; Clifford F Melick
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct       Date:  2003-12-19

4.  Various surgical approaches to treat voiding dysfunction following anti-incontinence surgery.

Authors:  Jeffrey Segal; Andrew Steele; Brett Vassallo; Steven Kleeman; Andre W Silva; Rachel Pauls; Peggy Walsh; Mickey Karram
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct       Date:  2006-01-21

5.  Transvaginal urethrolysis for obstruction after antiincontinence surgery.

Authors:  Rebecca McCrery; Rodney Appell
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct       Date:  2006-10-12

Review 6.  Complications of anterior compartment vaginal surgery.

Authors:  Eric S Rovner
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 3.092

Review 7.  Managing women with complex presentations: How to approach concomitant prolapse and voiding dysfunction.

Authors:  Cornelius Kelleher
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 1.862

8.  Predicting for postoperative incontinence following sling incision.

Authors:  Timothy Yoost; Ross Rames; Brett Lebed; Robin Bhavsar; Eric Rovner
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2010-12-03       Impact factor: 2.894

9.  Obstruction after Burch colposuspension: a return to retropubic urethrolysis.

Authors:  Jennifer T Anger; Cindy L Amundsen; George D Webster
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct       Date:  2005-11-10

Review 10.  Safety considerations for synthetic sling surgery.

Authors:  Jerry G Blaivas; Rajveer S Purohit; Matthew S Benedon; Gabriel Mekel; Michael Stern; Mubashir Billah; Kola Olugbade; Robert Bendavid; Vladimir Iakovlev
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2015-08-18       Impact factor: 14.432

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.