Literature DB >> 10081882

Office based criteria for predicting type II stress incontinence without further evaluation studies.

A C Diokno1, R R Dimaculangan, E U Lim, B W Steinert.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The 1996 Agency for Health Care Policy and Research Clinical Practice Guidelines for Urinary Incontinence suggested that surgery may be performed after basic evaluation without further testing in cases of uncomplicated nonrecurrent type II stress urinary incontinence. However, they failed to recommend explicit office based criteria to identify this condition without further invasive testing. We establish such criteria and test the efficacy.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Records of 101 women with urinary incontinence who underwent complete evaluation from June 1995 to September 1997 were reviewed. Basic evaluation consisted of medical history, physical/pelvic examination and the validated Medical, Epidemiologic and Social Aspects of Aging Urinary Incontinence Questionnaire, while further testing included cystourethroscopy, urodynamics and lateral stress cystogram. All cases diagnosed as pure type II stress urinary incontinence after basic and further testing were identified, and office based findings were characterized, which included medical history, questionnaire scores, vaginal speculum examination results and post-void residual urine volume. These criteria were applied in a blinded fashion to the initial group of 101 patients and then to a new group of 45 women with incontinence who recently underwent complete evaluation.
RESULTS: Specificity and positive predictive value were 100% in both groups for nonsurgical cases, compared to 81 and 71% in the initial, and 75 and 60% in the new group, respectively, for surgical cases.
CONCLUSIONS: Our office based criteria are 100% specific for predicting pure type II stress urinary incontinence in women with no suspension surgery and, thus, have the potential of reducing the need for further invasive testing and consequently the cost of preoperative evaluation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10081882

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Urol        ISSN: 0022-5347            Impact factor:   7.450


  6 in total

Review 1.  Addressing the need for a simpler algorithm for the management of women with urinary incontinence.

Authors:  Lars Viktrup
Journal:  MedGenMed       Date:  2005-08-01

2.  Effect of Group-Administered Behavioral Treatment on Urinary Incontinence in Older Women: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Ananias C Diokno; Diane K Newman; Lisa K Low; Tomas L Griebling; Michael E Maddens; Patricia S Goode; Trivellore E Raghunathan; Leslee L Subak; Carolyn M Sampselle; Judith A Boura; Ann E Robinson; Donna McIntyre; Kathryn L Burgio
Journal:  JAMA Intern Med       Date:  2018-10-01       Impact factor: 21.873

3.  The sensitivity and specificity of a simple test to distinguish between urge and stress urinary incontinence.

Authors:  Jeanette S Brown; Catherine S Bradley; Leslee L Subak; Holly E Richter; Stephen R Kraus; Linda Brubaker; Feng Lin; Eric Vittinghoff; Deborah Grady
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2006-05-16       Impact factor: 25.391

Review 4.  Contemporary diagnosis of lower urinary tract dysfunction.

Authors:  Peter Rosier
Journal:  F1000Res       Date:  2019-05-09

Review 5.  Distress and quality of life characteristics associated with seeking surgical treatment for stress urinary incontinence.

Authors:  Karen M Gil; Amber M Somerville; Sara Cichowski; Jennifer L Savitski
Journal:  Health Qual Life Outcomes       Date:  2009-02-05       Impact factor: 3.186

6.  Evaluation and outcome measures in the treatment of female urinary stress incontinence: International Urogynecological Association (IUGA) guidelines for research and clinical practice.

Authors:  G Ghoniem; E Stanford; K Kenton; C Achtari; R Goldberg; T Mascarenhas; M Parekh; K Tamussino; S Tosson; G Lose; E Petri
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct       Date:  2007-11-17
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.