Literature DB >> 10081868

The changing pattern of prostate cancer at the time of diagnosis: characteristics of screen detected prostate cancer in a population based screening study.

J B Rietbergen1, R F Hoedemaeker, A E Kruger, W J Kirkels, F H Schröder.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: We describe the clinical and pathological features of prostate cancer diagnosed through serum prostate specific antigen (PSA), digital rectal examination and transrectal ultrasonography in a population based randomized screening study.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between November 1993 and June 1997, 20,632 volunteers 55 to 76 years old were included in the study. In the screening arm 9,776 men underwent digital rectal examination, transrectal ultrasound and serum PSA determination. Biopsies were taken if the digital rectal examination and/or transrectal ultrasound findings were abnormal or if PSA was 4 ng/ml or greater. A total of 2,262 men underwent biopsy and 474 cases of prostate cancer were diagnosed.
RESULTS: The pretreatment data were complete in 459 men, of whom 78% had clinically organ confined disease. Bone or lymph node metastases were seen in 8 cases (1.7%). Of 172 men who underwent radical prostatectomy 2 had lymph node metastases. Overall 66.3% of men treated with radical prostatectomy had organ confined disease.
CONCLUSIONS: Comparison of the characteristics of prostate cancer detected through screening of the general population with those in a population based cohort of men in which there was no organized screening revealed stage reduction, primarily with regard to number of metastatic cases. Whether this stage reduction will lead to a decrease in disease specific mortality remains unknown until the study is completed and the end point of prostate cancer specific mortality is evaluated.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10081868

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Urol        ISSN: 0022-5347            Impact factor:   7.450


  11 in total

Review 1.  Is it necessary to do staging pelvic lymph node dissection for T1c prostate cancer?

Authors:  M V Meng; P R Carroll
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 3.092

Review 2.  Differentiation of lethal and non lethal prostate cancer: PSA and PSA isoforms and kinetics.

Authors:  H Ballentine Carter
Journal:  Asian J Androl       Date:  2012-02-20       Impact factor: 3.285

Review 3.  [How to use PSA in 2009].

Authors:  Anton Ponholzer; Franz Stoiber; Wolfgang Loidl; Michael Rauchenwald; Paul Schramek; Stephan Madersbacher
Journal:  Wien Med Wochenschr       Date:  2009

4.  Pilot study of the practical relevance of a one-step test for prostate-specific antigen in capillary blood to improve the acceptance rate in the early detection program of prostate carcinoma.

Authors:  W Berg; C Linder; G Eschholz; J Schubert
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 2.370

5.  Screening for prostate cancer in Romania.

Authors:  Raphaela Waidelich; Gheorghe Bumbu; Marius Raica; Marieta Toma; Teodor Maghiar; Alfons Hofstetter
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 2.370

6.  Patients treated with radical prostatectomy with positive digital rectal examination findings in the intermediate-risk group are prone to PSA recurrence.

Authors:  Nobuki Furubayashi; Takahito Negishi; Shintaro Ura; Jun Mutaguchi; Kenichi Taguchi; Mototsugu Shimokawa; Motonobu Nakamura
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2016-04-20       Impact factor: 2.967

7.  Prostate-Specific Antigen Density as a Powerful Predictor of Extracapsular Extension and Positive Surgical Margin in Radical Prostatectomy Patients with Prostate-Specific Antigen Levels of Less than 10 ng/ml.

Authors:  Jin-Seok Chang; Hoon Choi; Young-Seop Chang; Jin-Bum Kim; Mi Mi Oh; Du Geon Moon; Jae Hyun Bae; Jun Cheon
Journal:  Korean J Urol       Date:  2011-12-20

Review 8.  Management of patients with an increasing prostate-specific antigen after radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Masood A Khan; Alan W Partin
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 2.862

Review 9.  Overdiagnosis and overtreatment of early detected prostate cancer.

Authors:  C H Bangma; S Roemeling; F H Schröder
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2007-02-14       Impact factor: 4.226

10.  Differences between men with screening-detected versus clinically diagnosed prostate cancers in the USA.

Authors:  Richard M Hoffman; S Noell Stone; David Espey; Arnold L Potosky
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2005-03-08       Impact factor: 4.430

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.