Literature DB >> 10081654

Guidelines for good scientific practice.

D Andersen1.   

Abstract

The Danish Committee on Scientific Dishonesty (DCSD) has existed for five years. As a preventive measure two sets of guidelines for the presentation of experimental reports and data documentation have been issued. Experiences from 24 cases of suspected scientific dishonesty have proven a need for further guidelines covering a wider range of scientific practice. Three key areas susceptible to conflicts between researchers and often resulting in subsequent accusations of scientific misconduct have been localized. Guidelines have, therefore, been prepared for these three areas: 1) Agreements at the start of cooperative research projects. 2) Rights and duties in storing and using research data. 3) Authorship. It is hoped that they will be helpful in prevention of conflicts and deviations from good scientific practice, and that they will be useful in the education of young researchers. The Danish Committee on Scientific Dishonesty. The Ministry of Research and Information Technology, Copenhagen.

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10081654

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dan Med Bull        ISSN: 0907-8916


  2 in total

1.  Scientific dishonestry: European reflections.

Authors:  P Riis
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 3.411

2.  Suitability of current definitions of ambulatory care sensitive conditions for research in emergency department patients: a secondary health data analysis.

Authors:  Johann Frick; Martin Möckel; Reinhold Muller; Julia Searle; Rajan Somasundaram; Anna Slagman
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2017-10-22       Impact factor: 2.692

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.