AIMS AND BACKGROUND: To estimate the cost per woman examined and per CIN II or more severe lesion detected in a population-based cytologic screening program for cervical cancer prevention. An organized cytologic screening program has been ongoing in the Florence District since 1973, and a call-recall system using mail invitation has been ongoing since 1980. Smear reading and assessment of screening positives is centralized at the screening unit. METHODS AND STUDY DESIGN: All relevant resources (costs) consumed by the program were listed and measured. The unit cost per examined woman and per each CIN II or more severe lesion detected was estimated for each screening phase (recruitment, screening, assessment). RESULTS: The cost per examined woman was $24.60, whereas that per CIN II or more severe lesion detected was $13,600. Staff accounted for 80% of total amount. CONCLUSIONS: Although the cost for a single procedure is low, the cost per detected lesion is quite remarkable due to the low detection rate in a population screened for a long time. Different approaches and longer interval screening tests are discussed.
AIMS AND BACKGROUND: To estimate the cost per woman examined and per CIN II or more severe lesion detected in a population-based cytologic screening program for cervical cancer prevention. An organized cytologic screening program has been ongoing in the Florence District since 1973, and a call-recall system using mail invitation has been ongoing since 1980. Smear reading and assessment of screening positives is centralized at the screening unit. METHODS AND STUDY DESIGN: All relevant resources (costs) consumed by the program were listed and measured. The unit cost per examined woman and per each CIN II or more severe lesion detected was estimated for each screening phase (recruitment, screening, assessment). RESULTS: The cost per examined woman was $24.60, whereas that per CIN II or more severe lesion detected was $13,600. Staff accounted for 80% of total amount. CONCLUSIONS: Although the cost for a single procedure is low, the cost per detected lesion is quite remarkable due to the low detection rate in a population screened for a long time. Different approaches and longer interval screening tests are discussed.