Literature DB >> 10080590

Benefits and costs of screening Ashkenazi Jewish women for BRCA1 and BRCA2.

V R Grann1, W Whang, J S Jacobson, D F Heitjan, K H Antman, A I Neugut.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To determine the survival benefit and cost-effectiveness of screening Ashkenazi Jewish women for three specific BRCA1/2 gene mutations.
METHODS: We used a Markov model and Monte Carlo analysis to estimate the survival benefit and cost-effectiveness of screening for three specific mutations in a population in which their prevalence is 2.5% and the associated cancer risks are 56% for breast cancer and 16% for ovarian cancer. We assumed that the sensitivity and specificity of the test were 98% and 99%, respectively, that bilateral prophylactic oophorectomy would reduce ovarian cancer risk by 45%, and that bilateral prophylactic mastectomy would reduce breast cancer risk by 90%. We used Medicare payment data for treatment costs and Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results data for cancer survival.
RESULTS: Our model suggests that genetic screening of this population could prolong average nondiscounted survival by 38 days (95% probability interval, 22 to 57 days) for combined surgery, 33 days (95% probability interval, 18 to 43 days) for mastectomy, 11 days (95% probability interval, 4 to 25 days) for oophorectomy, and 6 days (95% probability interval, 3 to 8 days) for surveillance. The respective cost-effectiveness ratios per life-year saved, with a discount rate of 3%, are $20,717, $29,970, $72,780, and $134,273.
CONCLUSION: In this Ashkenazi Jewish population, with a high prevalence of BRCA1/2 mutations, genetic screening may significantly increase average survival and, depending on costs and screening/treatment strategies, may be cost-effective by the standards of accepted cancer screening tests. According to our model, screening is cost-effective only if all women who test positive undergo prophylactic surgery. These estimates require confirmation through prospective observational studies and clinical trials.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10080590     DOI: 10.1200/JCO.1999.17.2.494

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0732-183X            Impact factor:   44.544


  15 in total

Review 1.  One of these things is not like the others: the idea of precedence in health technology assessment and coverage decisions.

Authors:  Mita Giacomini
Journal:  Milbank Q       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 4.911

2.  Estimating the efficacy and efficiency of cascade genetic screening.

Authors:  M Krawczak; D N Cooper; J Schmidtke
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2001-06-26       Impact factor: 11.025

Review 3.  Genetic testing and common disorders in a public health framework: how to assess relevance and possibilities. Background Document to the ESHG recommendations on genetic testing and common disorders.

Authors:  Frauke Becker; Carla G van El; Dolores Ibarreta; Eleni Zika; Stuart Hogarth; Pascal Borry; Anne Cambon-Thomsen; Jean Jacques Cassiman; Gerry Evers-Kiebooms; Shirley Hodgson; A Cécile J W Janssens; Helena Kaariainen; Michael Krawczak; Ulf Kristoffersson; Jan Lubinski; Christine Patch; Victor B Penchaszadeh; Andrew Read; Wolf Rogowski; Jorge Sequeiros; Lisbeth Tranebjaerg; Irene M van Langen; Helen Wallace; Ron Zimmern; Jörg Schmidtke; Martina C Cornel
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 4.246

Review 4.  HIV-1 drug resistance genotyping. A review of clinical and economic issues.

Authors:  C Chaix-Couturier; C Holtzer; K A Phillips; I Durand-Zaleski; J Stansell
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 5.  Hereditary breast cancer in Jews.

Authors:  Wendy S Rubinstein
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 2.375

Review 6.  Economic evaluation of targeted cancer interventions: critical review and recommendations.

Authors:  Elena B Elkin; Deborah A Marshall; Nathalie A Kulin; Ilia L Ferrusi; Michael J Hassett; Uri Ladabaum; Kathryn A Phillips
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 8.822

Review 7.  Economic evidence on identifying clinically actionable findings with whole-genome sequencing: a scoping review.

Authors:  Michael P Douglas; Uri Ladabaum; Mark J Pletcher; Deborah A Marshall; Kathryn A Phillips
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2015-05-21       Impact factor: 8.822

Review 8.  Is individualized medicine more cost-effective? A systematic review.

Authors:  Maximilian H M Hatz; Katharina Schremser; Wolf H Rogowski
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2014-05       Impact factor: 4.981

9.  Estimating the survival benefits gained from providing national cancer genetic services to women with a family history of breast cancer.

Authors:  G L Griffith; R T Edwards; J Gray; C Wilkinson; J Turner; B France; P Bennett
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2004-05-17       Impact factor: 7.640

Review 10.  Cancer genetics services: a systematic review of the economic evidence and issues.

Authors:  G L Griffith; R T Edwards; J Gray
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2004-05-04       Impact factor: 7.640

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.