N Verma1, S Melengas, J A Garap. 1. Eye Clinic, Port Moresby General Hospital, Boroko, Papua New Guinea. nitinverma@bigpond.com
Abstract
PURPOSE/ BACKGROUND: Penetrating keratoplasty is the logical solution for the management of corneal opacities. In situations such as in Papua New Guinea, where donor corneal tissue is scarce and corneal opacities are plenty, an alternative procedure for the management of corneal opacities in the form of ipsilateral rotational autokeratoplasty was considered. METHODS: In the present prospective study, ipsilateral rotational autokeratoplasty was performed in 17 eyes over a 2 year period in a general hospital. The patient's cornea was trephined eccentrically and the corneal opacity was dialed out of the visual axis and was replaced by clear peripheral cornea. RESULTS: Most opacities were leucomata (76.4%). The average size of the opacity was 5.1 mm and the corneal button size was 7 mm.A final visual acuity of 6/18 or better was obtained in 64.7% of cases (at 12 months). No significant postoperative complications were encountered. No complex formula was needed to calculate the size of the button and, by simply adding 3 mm to the pupillary diameter in standard illumination, one could make an estimation of the graft diameter. CONCLUSIONS: Rotational autokeratoplasty has a definite role in places where donor corneal tissue is scarce, in patients in whom long-term steroids are a risk or in situations where follow up of patients is difficult. Rejection is a theoretical impossibility, but late endothelial failure could occur, requiring regrafting. Rotational autokeratoplasty should be seriously considered as an alternative to conventional penetrating keratoplasty.
PURPOSE/ BACKGROUND: Penetrating keratoplasty is the logical solution for the management of corneal opacities. In situations such as in Papua New Guinea, where donor corneal tissue is scarce and corneal opacities are plenty, an alternative procedure for the management of corneal opacities in the form of ipsilateral rotational autokeratoplasty was considered. METHODS: In the present prospective study, ipsilateral rotational autokeratoplasty was performed in 17 eyes over a 2 year period in a general hospital. The patient's cornea was trephined eccentrically and the corneal opacity was dialed out of the visual axis and was replaced by clear peripheral cornea. RESULTS: Most opacities were leucomata (76.4%). The average size of the opacity was 5.1 mm and the corneal button size was 7 mm.A final visual acuity of 6/18 or better was obtained in 64.7% of cases (at 12 months). No significant postoperative complications were encountered. No complex formula was needed to calculate the size of the button and, by simply adding 3 mm to the pupillary diameter in standard illumination, one could make an estimation of the graft diameter. CONCLUSIONS:Rotational autokeratoplasty has a definite role in places where donor corneal tissue is scarce, in patients in whom long-term steroids are a risk or in situations where follow up of patients is difficult. Rejection is a theoretical impossibility, but late endothelial failure could occur, requiring regrafting. Rotational autokeratoplasty should be seriously considered as an alternative to conventional penetrating keratoplasty.