K D Henry1, C Rosemond, L B Eckert. 1. Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Department, The Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, MD 21287, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: There is limited research on the effects of the number of exercises a person is told to perform on compliance and performance, as defined by cueing requirements, correct alignment, and quality of movement. Some studies of medication suggest that compliance decreases as the number of medications increases. The purpose of this study was to determine whether older adults comply and perform better (ie, requiring less cueing, exhibiting correct alignment, and exhibiting controlled, coordinated, and continuous movements) when they are asked to do 2, 5, or 8 exercises. SUBJECTS:Subjects were 11 women and 4 men, aged 67 to 82 years (X=72.8), who were living independently in their communities. METHODS: Subjects were randomly prescribed 2, 5, or 8 general strengthening home exercises. They were instructed on their exercises at an initial session and asked to record the number of repetitions performed each day in a self-report exercise log. At a return session 7 to 10 days later, subjects were scored on their performance of the prescribed exercises using a newly designed assessment tool. RESULTS: The group that was prescribed 2 exercises performed better, as defined by their performance tool score, than the group that was prescribed 8 exercises. The group that was prescribed 5 exercises was not different from the groups that performed 2 or 8 exercises. No differences were found among groups regarding the self-report measurement of compliance. There was a moderate correlation between performance scores and the self-report percentage rates. CONCLUSION AND DISCUSSION: Subjects who were prescribed 2 exercises performed better than subjects who were prescribed 8 exercises. The question of an optimal number of exercises to prescribe to elderly people warrants further study.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: There is limited research on the effects of the number of exercises a person is told to perform on compliance and performance, as defined by cueing requirements, correct alignment, and quality of movement. Some studies of medication suggest that compliance decreases as the number of medications increases. The purpose of this study was to determine whether older adults comply and perform better (ie, requiring less cueing, exhibiting correct alignment, and exhibiting controlled, coordinated, and continuous movements) when they are asked to do 2, 5, or 8 exercises. SUBJECTS: Subjects were 11 women and 4 men, aged 67 to 82 years (X=72.8), who were living independently in their communities. METHODS: Subjects were randomly prescribed 2, 5, or 8 general strengthening home exercises. They were instructed on their exercises at an initial session and asked to record the number of repetitions performed each day in a self-report exercise log. At a return session 7 to 10 days later, subjects were scored on their performance of the prescribed exercises using a newly designed assessment tool. RESULTS: The group that was prescribed 2 exercises performed better, as defined by their performance tool score, than the group that was prescribed 8 exercises. The group that was prescribed 5 exercises was not different from the groups that performed 2 or 8 exercises. No differences were found among groups regarding the self-report measurement of compliance. There was a moderate correlation between performance scores and the self-report percentage rates. CONCLUSION AND DISCUSSION: Subjects who were prescribed 2 exercises performed better than subjects who were prescribed 8 exercises. The question of an optimal number of exercises to prescribe to elderly people warrants further study.
Authors: Pilar Escolar-Reina; Francesc Medina-Mirapeix; Juan J Gascón-Cánovas; Joaquina Montilla-Herrador; Francisco J Jimeno-Serrano; Silvana L de Oliveira Sousa; M Elena del Baño-Aledo; Rafael Lomas-Vega Journal: BMC Health Serv Res Date: 2010-03-10 Impact factor: 2.655
Authors: Timo Hinrichs; Claudio Bucchi; Michael Brach; Stefan Wilm; Heinz G Endres; Ina Burghaus; Hans-Joachim Trampisch; Petra Platen Journal: BMC Geriatr Date: 2009-08-17 Impact factor: 3.921
Authors: Kim L Bennell; Thorlene Egerton; Yong-Hao Pua; J Haxby Abbott; Kevin Sims; Ben Metcalf; Fiona McManus; Tim V Wrigley; Andrew Forbes; Anthony Harris; Rachelle Buchbinder Journal: BMC Musculoskelet Disord Date: 2010-10-14 Impact factor: 2.362
Authors: Carmen de Labra; Christyanne Guimaraes-Pinheiro; Ana Maseda; Trinidad Lorenzo; José C Millán-Calenti Journal: BMC Geriatr Date: 2015-12-02 Impact factor: 3.921
Authors: Shane M McClinton; Timothy W Flynn; Bryan C Heiderscheit; Thomas G McPoil; Daniel Pinto; Pamela A Duffy; John D Bennett Journal: Trials Date: 2013-12-03 Impact factor: 2.279