SUBJECT AND METHOD: Percutaneous cardiopulmonary bypass support is beneficial for patients with circulatory collapse. However, therapeutic strategies of percutaneous cardiopulmonary bypass support for post-cardiotomy LOS have not been determined. We reviewed 9 patients undergoing cardiac surgery and treated with percutaneous cardiopulmonary bypass support to determine an adequate strategy for perioperative use of percutaneous cardiopulmonary bypass support. Patients included 8 males and 1 female with a mean age of 56.4 +/- 3.9 years. Six patients with IHD underwent CABG for 5 and CABG + MVR for 1 patient and 3 patients with valvular disease underwent AVR, AVR + MVR, and Ross operation respectively. Indication for percutaneous cardiopulmonary bypass support was post-cardiotomy LOS in 7 and preoperative cardiogenic shock in 2 patients. All patients underwent IABP associated with percutaneous cardiopulmonary bypass support. Systemic blood pressure was regulated to 100-120 mmHg by percutaneous cardiopulmonary bypass support flow and with minimum inotropic supports. RESULTS: Six of 9 patients (66.7%) were weaned from percutaneous cardiopulmonary bypass support and 5 patients were discharged. Five of 6 patients (83.3%) with IHD were weaned from percutaneous cardiopulmonary bypass support compared to 1 of 3 patients (33.3%) (p = 0.134) with valvular disease. Hemodynamic conditions in patients weaned from percutaneous cardiopulmonary bypass support were markedly improved within 40 hours of the introduction of percutaneous cardiopulmonary bypass support (mean percutaneous cardiopulmonary bypass support running time: 23.9 +/- 5.5 hrs). In contrast, those unable to be weaned from percutaneous cardiopulmonary bypass support (mean percutaneous cardiopulmonary bypass support running time: 84.3 +/- 6.3 hrs) showed no improvement and developed major complications such as cerebral damage or multiorgan failure. CONCLUSIONS: Perioperative use of percutaneous cardiopulmonary bypass support may be more effective for patients undergoing coronary artery surgery. Limited use of percutaneous cardiopulmonary bypass support within 48 hours may be applicable for post-cardiotomy patients.
SUBJECT AND METHOD: Percutaneous cardiopulmonary bypass support is beneficial for patients with circulatory collapse. However, therapeutic strategies of percutaneous cardiopulmonary bypass support for post-cardiotomy LOS have not been determined. We reviewed 9 patients undergoing cardiac surgery and treated with percutaneous cardiopulmonary bypass support to determine an adequate strategy for perioperative use of percutaneous cardiopulmonary bypass support. Patients included 8 males and 1 female with a mean age of 56.4 +/- 3.9 years. Six patients with IHD underwent CABG for 5 and CABG + MVR for 1 patient and 3 patients with valvular disease underwent AVR, AVR + MVR, and Ross operation respectively. Indication for percutaneous cardiopulmonary bypass support was post-cardiotomy LOS in 7 and preoperative cardiogenic shock in 2 patients. All patients underwent IABP associated with percutaneous cardiopulmonary bypass support. Systemic blood pressure was regulated to 100-120 mmHg by percutaneous cardiopulmonary bypass support flow and with minimum inotropic supports. RESULTS: Six of 9 patients (66.7%) were weaned from percutaneous cardiopulmonary bypass support and 5 patients were discharged. Five of 6 patients (83.3%) with IHD were weaned from percutaneous cardiopulmonary bypass support compared to 1 of 3 patients (33.3%) (p = 0.134) with valvular disease. Hemodynamic conditions in patients weaned from percutaneous cardiopulmonary bypass support were markedly improved within 40 hours of the introduction of percutaneous cardiopulmonary bypass support (mean percutaneous cardiopulmonary bypass support running time: 23.9 +/- 5.5 hrs). In contrast, those unable to be weaned from percutaneous cardiopulmonary bypass support (mean percutaneous cardiopulmonary bypass support running time: 84.3 +/- 6.3 hrs) showed no improvement and developed major complications such as cerebral damage or multiorgan failure. CONCLUSIONS: Perioperative use of percutaneous cardiopulmonary bypass support may be more effective for patients undergoing coronary artery surgery. Limited use of percutaneous cardiopulmonary bypass support within 48 hours may be applicable for post-cardiotomy patients.
Authors: M R Mooney; K V Arom; L D Joyce; J F Mooney; I F Goldenberg; T J Von Rueden; R W Emery Journal: J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg Date: 1991-03 Impact factor: 5.209
Authors: S J Phillips; B Ballentine; D Slonine; J Hall; J Vandehaar; C Kongtahworn; R H Zeff; J R Skinner; K Reckmo; D Gray Journal: Ann Thorac Surg Date: 1983-08 Impact factor: 4.330
Authors: D D Muehrcke; P M McCarthy; R W Stewart; R C Foster; D A Ogella; J A Borsh; D M Cosgrove Journal: Ann Thorac Surg Date: 1996-02 Impact factor: 4.330
Authors: S J Phillips; R H Zeff; C Kongtahworn; J R Skinner; R S Toon; A Grignon; R M Kennerly; W Wickemeyer; L A Iannone Journal: Ann Thorac Surg Date: 1989-01 Impact factor: 4.330