Literature DB >> 10076318

Constructing a home birth environment through assuming control.

S Morison1, Y Hauck, P Percival, A McMurray.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this qualitative study was to describe the experience of couples who have had a home birth. DESIGN, SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: A phenomenological approach was used to provide an understanding of the human experience of home birth in Western Australia. The research design consisted of a field study, in which 10 parent couples were interviewed and three videos of home births observed. Of the ten couples, four couples spoke of their first baby's home birth and the remaining six couples had three or four children who had been born at home.
FINDINGS: The couples' experiences of home birth were gained through identifying significant statements from transcripts and field notes, and clustering these into the following four themes: 'constructing the environment'; 'assuming control'; 'birthing'; and 'resolving expectations'. The themes of 'constructing the environment' and 'assuming control' are described in detail in this paper. 'Constructing the environment' describes how couples adapted the physical environment, and established support to create a positive birth environment. 'Assuming control' discusses exerting control and taking responsibility for the birth. The remaining themes of 'birthing' and 'resolving expectations' are described in a subsequent paper (Morison et al, in press). KEY
CONCLUSIONS: The research furnishes an insight into the couples' experience of home birth. The lived experience of birthing at home involved a process where a couple actively created an environment that enabled them to assume control and responsibility for the birth. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: The findings are important for midwives in any setting, as they reveal the extent to which some parents value the right to assume control and responsibility for the birth of their baby. Although the physical environment of a home birth cannot be replicated in every setting, issues specific to the birth environment are relevant to all midwives.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 10076318     DOI: 10.1016/s0266-6138(98)90095-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Midwifery        ISSN: 0266-6138            Impact factor:   2.372


  6 in total

1.  Fear causes tears - perineal injuries in home birth settings. A Swedish interview study.

Authors:  Helena E Lindgren; Åsa Brink; Marie Klinberg-Allvin
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2011-01-18       Impact factor: 3.007

2.  Pain acceptance and personal control in pain relief in two maternity care models: a cross-national comparison of Belgium and the Netherlands.

Authors:  Wendy Christiaens; Mieke Verhaeghe; Piet Bracke
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2010-09-10       Impact factor: 2.655

3.  Concurrent analysis of choice and control in childbirth.

Authors:  Austyn Snowden; Colin Martin; Julie Jomeen; Caroline Hollins Martin
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2011-06-01       Impact factor: 3.007

4.  Effects of Birthing Room Design on Maternal and Neonate Outcomes: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Christina Nilsson; Helle Wijk; Lina Höglund; Helen Sjöblom; Eva Hessman; Marie Berg
Journal:  HERD       Date:  2020-02-20

5.  Perspectives of pregnant women during the COVID-19 pandemic: A qualitative study.

Authors:  Kiran Atmuri; Mahbub Sarkar; Efe Obudu; Arunaz Kumar
Journal:  Women Birth       Date:  2021-03-15       Impact factor: 3.172

6.  Room4Birth - the effect of an adaptable birthing room on labour and birth outcomes for nulliparous women at term with spontaneous labour start: study protocol for a randomised controlled superiority trial in Sweden.

Authors:  Marie Berg; Lisa Goldkuhl; Christina Nilsson; Helle Wijk; Hanna Gyllensten; Göran Lindahl; Kerstin Uvnäs Moberg; Cecily Begley
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2019-11-19       Impact factor: 2.279

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.