Literature DB >> 10076127

Gasless laparoscopic ovarian cystectomy during pregnancy: comparison with laparotomy.

S Akira1, A Yamanaka, T Ishihara, T Takeshita, T Araki.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The efficacy and safety of gasless laparoscopic ovarian cystectomy during pregnancy were compared with those of conventional laparotomy. STUDY
DESIGN: Subjects for the 2 study groups were selected from consecutive patients who satisfied all entrance criteria. Seventeen women who underwent gasless laparoscopic cystectomy were compared with 18 women who underwent cystectomy by laparotomy. The intraoperative and postoperative courses, pregnancy outcomes, and complications were compared.
RESULTS: The patients' ages, body mass indexes, mean cyst diameters, fetal gestational ages, and types of cysts did not differ significantly between the two groups. Blood loss, analgesic use, and need for tocolytic agents were significantly less in the laparoscopy group than in the laparotomy group. No abortions or preterm deliveries occurred in the laparoscopy group, whereas 1 abortion was recorded in the laparotomy group.
CONCLUSION: Gasless laparoscopic ovarian cystectomy offers significant advantages with respect to laparotomy for the pregnant patient.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10076127     DOI: 10.1016/s0002-9378(99)70253-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0002-9378            Impact factor:   8.661


  9 in total

1.  Outcome in laparoscopic management of persistent adnexal mass during the second trimester of pregnancy.

Authors:  P M Yuen; P S Ng; P L Leung; M S Rogers
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2004-05-28       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment, and use of laparoscopy for surgical problems during pregnancy: this statement was reviewed and approved by the Board of Governors of the Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons (SAGES), September 2007. It was prepared by the SAGES Guidelines Committee.

Authors:  Hori Yumi
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2008-02-21       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 3.  Diagnosis and laparoscopic treatment of surgical diseases during pregnancy: an evidence-based review.

Authors:  Heidi Jackson; Steven Granger; Raymond Price; Michael Rollins; David Earle; William Richardson; Robert Fanelli
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2008-06-14       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment, and use of laparoscopy for surgical problems during pregnancy.

Authors:  Jonathan Pearl; Raymond Price; William Richardson; Robert Fanelli
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2011-09-23       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Robotic surgery for adnexal masses in pregnancy.

Authors:  Lauren A Baldwin; Iwona Podzielinski; Scott T Goodrich; Leigh G Seamon
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2011-03-09

6.  Risk Factors and Risk Stratification for Adverse Obstetrical Outcomes After Appendectomy or Cholecystectomy During Pregnancy.

Authors:  Adam Sachs; Jean Guglielminotti; Russell Miller; Ruth Landau; Richard Smiley; Guohua Li
Journal:  JAMA Surg       Date:  2017-05-01       Impact factor: 14.766

Review 7.  Therapeutic management of epithelial ovarian cancer during pregnancy.

Authors:  L Minig; L Otaño; I Diaz-Padilla; R Alvarez Gallego; M G Patrono; J Valero de Bernabé
Journal:  Clin Transl Oncol       Date:  2012-11-21       Impact factor: 3.405

Review 8.  Clinical effectiveness of gasless laparoscopic surgery for abdominal conditions: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  N Aruparayil; W Bolton; A Mishra; L Bains; J Gnanaraj; R King; T Ensor; N King; D Jayne; B Shinkins
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2021-08-16       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 9.  Laparoscopy versus open surgery for adnexal masses in pregnancy: a meta-analytic review.

Authors:  Piaopiao Ye; Na Zhao; Jing Shu; Heping Shen; Yanpeng Wang; Lifeng Chen; Xiaojian Yan
Journal:  Arch Gynecol Obstet       Date:  2019-01-31       Impact factor: 2.344

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.