Literature DB >> 10075133

Who is afraid of the system? Doctors' attitude towards diagnostic systems.

J Ridderikhoff1, B van Herk.   

Abstract

Although physicians indicate a need for diagnostic support, devices that may provide such support, i.e. computer-aided systems are not in widespread use. Practising physicians often blame this on the computer. We have tested this idea by asking physicians to solve a number of patient problems with the help of a diagnostic decision support system in a realistic environment. As we expected, the use of the computer was not found to be an obstacle. However, the support part of the system, which was meant to stimulate the user's thoughts and to prompt him to review his conclusions, turned out to be problematic. The critiquing function of the system hardly seemed appreciated by the participants, and only rarely influenced their diagnostic judgement. Sources of additional information were ignored. We have come to the conclusion that the combination of physicians and computer-aided diagnosis deserves further and thorough exploration.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10075133     DOI: 10.1016/s1386-5056(98)00145-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Med Inform        ISSN: 1386-5056            Impact factor:   4.046


  5 in total

Review 1.  Modeling paradigms for medical diagnostic decision support: a survey and future directions.

Authors:  Kavishwar B Wagholikar; Vijayraghavan Sundararajan; Ashok W Deshpande
Journal:  J Med Syst       Date:  2011-10-01       Impact factor: 4.460

2.  Computer-aided DSM-IV-diagnostics - acceptance, use and perceived usefulness in relation to users' learning styles.

Authors:  Lars G Bergman; Uno G H Fors
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2005-01-07       Impact factor: 2.796

3.  Adapting to the algorithm: how accuracy comparisons promote the use of a decision aid.

Authors:  Garston Liang; Jennifer F Sloane; Christopher Donkin; Ben R Newell
Journal:  Cogn Res Princ Implic       Date:  2022-02-08

4.  Intention to adopt clinical decision support systems in a developing country: effect of physician's perceived professional autonomy, involvement and belief: a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Murali Sambasivan; Pouyan Esmaeilzadeh; Naresh Kumar; Hossein Nezakati
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2012-12-05       Impact factor: 2.796

5.  Group differences in physician responses to handheld presentation of clinical evidence: a verbal protocol analysis.

Authors:  Danielle M Lottridge; Mark Chignell; Romana Danicic-Mizdrak; Nada J Pavlovic; Andre Kushniruk; Sharon E Straus
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2007-07-26       Impact factor: 2.796

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.