Literature DB >> 10073757

Microemboli detected by transcranial Doppler monitoring in patients during carotid angioplasty versus carotid endarterectomy.

W D Jordan1, D C Voellinger, D D Doblar, N P Plyushcheva, W S Fisher, H A McDowell.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: Microemboli, as detected by transcranial Doppler monitoring, have been shown to be a potential cause of strokes after carotid endarterectomy. We retrospectively reviewed 105 patients who underwent transcranial Doppler monitoring during 112 procedures for the treatment of 115 carotid bifurcation stenoses: 40 by percutaneous angioplasty with stenting and 75 by carotid endarterectomy. In PTAS procedures (n = 40), there was a mean of 74.0 emboli per stenosis (range 0-398, P = 0.0001) with 4 neurologic events per patient (P = 0.08). In CEA procedures (n = 76), there was a mean of 8.8. emboli per stenosis (range 0-102, P= 0.0001) with 1 neurologic event per patient (P = 0.08). The post-procedural neurological events in the percutaneous angioplasty with stenting population included two strokes (5.6%) and two transient ischemia attacks (5.6%). Microemboli for each of these cases totalled 133, 17, 29 and 47 (with one shower), respectively. One postoperative carotid endarterectomy patient was noted to have a stroke (1.4%), with 48 microemboli noted during that procedure. The mean emboli rate for percutaneous angioplasty with stenting patients with neurological events was 59.0: without complications it was 85.1. The mean emboli rate for carotid endarterectomy patients without complications was 8.3. Three percutaneous angioplasty with stenting patients had no emboli (7.5%), whereas 29 carotid endarterectomy patients had no emboli (38.7%).
CONCLUSION: The percutaneous angioplasty with stenting procedure is associated with more than eight times the rate of microemboli seen during carotid endarterectomy when evaluated with transcranial Doppler monitoring. Larger patient groups are needed to determine if this greater embolization rate has an associated risk of higher morbidity or mortality.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10073757     DOI: 10.1016/s0967-2109(98)00097-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cardiovasc Surg        ISSN: 0967-2109


  25 in total

1.  Angioplasty and stenting for severe stenosis of the extracranial portion of the internal carotid artery.

Authors:  Harold P Adams
Journal:  Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 5.081

2.  Diffusion-weighted MR imaging after angioplasty or angioplasty plus stenting of arteries supplying the brain.

Authors:  H J Jaeger; K D Mathias; R Drescher; E Hauth; G Bockisch; E Demirel; H M Gissler
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 3.825

3.  Endoscopic approach for carotid artery surgery.

Authors:  F Rubino; R Nahouraii; H Deutsch; W King; W B Inabnet; M Gagner
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2002-02-28       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Embolic protection devices.

Authors:  G Sangiorgi; A Colombo
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 5.994

5.  Brain protection with intracarotid filter in angioplasty and stenting of the cervical carotid bifurcation. Preliminary experience in five cases.

Authors:  G Bonaldi; G Minonzio; A Lunghi
Journal:  Interv Neuroradiol       Date:  2001-07-15       Impact factor: 1.610

6.  The amount of solid cerebral microemboli during carotid stenting does not relate to the frequency of silent ischemic lesions.

Authors:  M Rosenkranz; J Fiehler; W Niesen; C Waiblinger; B Eckert; O Wittkugel; T Kucinski; J Röther; H Zeumer; C Weiller; U Sliwka
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 3.825

7.  Reversal of flow during carotid artery stenting: use of the Parodi antiembolism system.

Authors:  Iris Q Grunwald; Panagiotis Papanagiotou; Tobias Struffert; Maria Politi; Christoph Krick; Bernd F M Romaike; Frank Ahlhelm; Wolfgang Reith
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  2007-01-05       Impact factor: 2.804

8.  Embolic protection device use in renal artery stent placement.

Authors:  Mallik R Thatipelli; Sanjay Misra; Srinivas R Sanikommu; Robert M Schainfeld; Sandeep K Sharma; Peter A Soukas
Journal:  J Vasc Interv Radiol       Date:  2009-03-27       Impact factor: 3.464

9.  Neurointervention for the peripheral radiologist: tips and tricks.

Authors:  Rush Chewning; Gerald Wyse; Kieran Murphy
Journal:  Semin Intervent Radiol       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 1.513

10.  Branch retinal artery occlusion following carotid stenting: A case report.

Authors:  Ran Sun; Xiao-Yan Peng; Qi-Sheng You; Li-Qun Jiao; Da-Chuan Liu
Journal:  Exp Ther Med       Date:  2016-08-09       Impact factor: 2.447

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.