Literature DB >> 10073734

The use of atypical antipsychotics in the management of schizophrenia.

M Campbell1, P I Young, D N Bateman, J M Smith, S H Thomas.   

Abstract

Long-term drug treatment of schizophrenia with conventional antipsychotics has limitations: an estimated quarter to one third of patients are treatment-resistant; conventional antipsychotics have only a modest impact upon negative symptoms (poverty of thought, social withdrawal and loss of affect); and adverse effects, particularly extrapyramidal symptoms (EPS). Newer, so-called atypical, antipsychotics such as olanzapine, risperidone, sertindole and clozapine (an old drug which was re-introduced in 1990) are claimed to address these limitations. Atypical agents are, at a minimum, at least as effective as conventional drugs such as haloperidol. They also cause substantially fewer extrapyramidal symptoms. However, some other adverse effects are more common than with conventional drugs. For example, clozapine carries a significant risk of serious blood disorders, for which special monitoring is mandatory; it also causes troublesome drowsiness and increased salivation more often than conventional agents. Some atypical agents cause more weight gain or QT prolongation than older agents. The choice of therapy is, therefore, not straightforward. At present, atypical agents represent an advance for patients with severe or intolerable EPS. Most published evidence exists to support the use of clozapine, which has also been shown to be effective in schizophrenia refractory to conventional agents. However, the need for compliance with blood count monitoring and its sedative properties make careful patient selection important. The extent of any additional direct benefit offered by atypical agents on negative symptoms is not yet clear. The lack of a depot formulation for atypical drugs may pose a significant practical problem. To date, only two double-blind studies in which atypical agents were compared directly have been published. Neither provides compelling evidence for the choice of one agent over another. Atypical agents are many times more expensive than conventional drugs. Although drug treatment constitutes only a small proportion of the costs of managing schizophrenia, the additional annual cost of the use of atypical agents in, say, a quarter of the likely U.K. schizophrenic population would be about 56 M pound sterling. There is only limited evidence of cost-effectiveness. Atypical antipsychotics are not currently licensed for other conditions where conventional antipsychotics are commonly used, such as behaviour disturbance or dementia in the elderly. Their dose, and place in treatment in such cases have yet to be determined.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10073734      PMCID: PMC2014208          DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2125.1999.00849.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol        ISSN: 0306-5251            Impact factor:   4.335


  24 in total

1.  Risperidone-induced neuroleptic malignant syndrome.

Authors:  P Webster; C Wijeratne
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1994-10-29       Impact factor: 79.321

Review 2.  Schizophrenia.

Authors:  J M Kane
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1996-01-04       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 3.  Schizophrenia: developmental neuroscience and pathobiology.

Authors:  J L Waddington
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1993-02-27       Impact factor: 79.321

4.  A comparison of quetiapine and chlorpromazine in the treatment of schizophrenia.

Authors:  J Peuskens; C G Link
Journal:  Acta Psychiatr Scand       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 6.392

5.  Olanzapine versus placebo and haloperidol: acute phase results of the North American double-blind olanzapine trial.

Authors:  C M Beasley; G Tollefson; P Tran; W Satterlee; T Sanger; S Hamilton
Journal:  Neuropsychopharmacology       Date:  1996-02       Impact factor: 7.853

Review 6.  Pitfalls and problems of the long term use of neuroleptic drugs in schizophrenia.

Authors:  M F Bristow; S R Hirsch
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  1993-02       Impact factor: 5.606

Review 7.  An update on the epidemiology of schizophrenia.

Authors:  M Beiser; W G Iacono
Journal:  Can J Psychiatry       Date:  1990-11       Impact factor: 4.356

8.  Randomized, double-blind, controlled trial of risperidone versus clozapine in patients with chronic schizophrenia.

Authors:  E Klieser; E Lehmann; E Kinzler; C Wurthmann; K Heinrich
Journal:  J Clin Psychopharmacol       Date:  1995-02       Impact factor: 3.153

9.  Clozapine-induced agranulocytosis. Incidence and risk factors in the United States.

Authors:  J M Alvir; J A Lieberman; A Z Safferman; J L Schwimmer; J A Schaaf
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1993-07-15       Impact factor: 91.245

10.  Different side effect profiles of risperidone and clozapine in 20 outpatients with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder: a pilot study.

Authors:  D G Daniel; T E Goldberg; D R Weinberger; J E Kleinman; D Pickar; L J Lubick; T S Williams
Journal:  Am J Psychiatry       Date:  1996-03       Impact factor: 18.112

View more
  13 in total

Review 1.  Novel antipsychotics: issues and controversies. Typicality of atypical antipsychotics.

Authors:  E Stip
Journal:  J Psychiatry Neurosci       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 6.186

Review 2.  Atypical antipsychotics: from potassium channels to torsade de pointes and sudden death.

Authors:  Karine Titier; Pierre-Olivier Girodet; Hélène Verdoux; Mathieu Molimard; Bernard Bégaud; Wilhelm Haverkamp; Malcolm Lader; Nicholas Moore
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 5.606

Review 3.  Aripiprazole.

Authors:  Jane K McGavin; Karen L Goa
Journal:  CNS Drugs       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 5.749

Review 4.  Biotransformation of post-clozapine antipsychotics: pharmacological implications.

Authors:  S Caccia
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 6.447

5.  Involvement of anti-inflammatory, antioxidant, and BDNF up-regulating properties in the antipsychotic-like effect of the essential oil of Alpinia zerumbet in mice: a comparative study with olanzapine.

Authors:  Fernanda Yvelize Ramos de Araújo; Adriano José Maia Chaves Filho; Adriana Mary Nunes; Gersilene Valente de Oliveira; Patrícia Xavier Lima Gomes; Germana Silva Vasconcelos; Jaqueline Carletti; Manoel Odorico de Moraes; Maria Elisabete de Moraes; Silvânia Maria Mendes Vasconcelos; Francisca Cléa Florenço de Sousa; David Freitas de Lucena; Danielle S Macedo
Journal:  Metab Brain Dis       Date:  2021-09-07       Impact factor: 3.584

6.  Relations between movement disorders and psychopathology under predominantly atypical antipsychotic treatment in adolescent patients with schizophrenia.

Authors:  Stefan Gebhardt; Fabian Härtling; Markus Hanke; Frank M Theisen; Richard von Georgi; Phillip Grant; Markus Mittendorf; Matthias Martin; Christian Fleischhaker; Eberhard Schulz; Helmut Remschmidt
Journal:  Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry       Date:  2007-09-14       Impact factor: 4.785

Review 7.  Assessing the value of antipsychotics for treating schizophrenia: the importance of evaluating and interpreting the clinical significance of individual service costs.

Authors:  Sandra L Tunis; Haya Ascher-Svanum; Michael Stensland; Bruce J Kinon
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 8.  Long-acting risperidone: a review of its use in schizophrenia.

Authors:  Tracy Swainston Harrison; Karen L Goa
Journal:  CNS Drugs       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 5.749

9.  Synthesis and evaluation of a series of 2-substituted-5-thiopropylpiperazine (piperidine)-1,3,4-oxadiazoles derivatives as atypical antipsychotics.

Authors:  Yin Chen; Xiangqing Xu; Xin Liu; Minquan Yu; Bi-Feng Liu; Guisen Zhang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-04-30       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 10.  Asenapine versus placebo for schizophrenia.

Authors:  Alistair Hay; Amy Byers; Marco Sereno; Manpreet Kaur Basra; Snigdha Dutta
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2015-11-24
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.