Literature DB >> 10073649

Intravertebral body reconstruction with an injectable in situ-setting carbonated apatite: biomechanical evaluation of a minimally invasive technique.

T A Schildhauer1, A P Bennett, T M Wright, J M Lane, P F O'Leary.   

Abstract

The ability to mechanically reinforce an osteoporotic vertebral body could impede spinal compression fracture and the associated pain and complications. Previous studies have shown that reinforcement of fractured vertebrae with conventional acrylic cement can relieve symptoms and avoid further collapse. In this study, we explored the use of a carbonated apatite cement combined with a minimally invasive injection technique to improve the compressive mechanical properties of cadaveric vertebral bodies. After establishing the biomechanical characteristics of cement formulations intended to have appropriate viscosities, we evaluated the infiltration of the cements into thoracic vertebral bodies using a combined suction-injection technique. The energy-absorption capabilities of the reinforced vertebral bodies were then measured during axial compressive tests and compared with those of nonreinforced vertebrae. The ultimate compressive strength of the cement formulations averaged from 11.6 to 17.7 MPa, depending on curing conditions. The suction-injection technique allowed from one-half to two-thirds of each vertebral body to be infiltrated with cement. Energy absorption was significantly higher (p < 0.05) between 25 and 70% collapse of the vertebral body in the specimens that received the apatite injection as compared with the controls. These results suggest that osteoporotic vertebral-body augmentation with the injection of apatite cement could prevent further collapse after initial failure has occurred. The osteoconductive nature of the cement and its ability to be remodeled by bone, together with its compressive strength, which is higher than that of cancellous bone, could provide better clinical results than those of current treatments with acrylic cement.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10073649     DOI: 10.1002/jor.1100170111

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Orthop Res        ISSN: 0736-0266            Impact factor:   3.494


  9 in total

1.  Ex vivo biomechanical comparison of hydroxyapatite and polymethylmethacrylate cements for use with vertebroplasty.

Authors:  Stephen M Belkoff; John M Mathis; Louis E Jasper
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2002 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.825

2.  Self-setting calcium orthophosphate formulations.

Authors:  Sergey V Dorozhkin
Journal:  J Funct Biomater       Date:  2013-11-12

3.  Load shift of the intervertebral disc after a vertebroplasty: a finite-element study.

Authors:  G Baroud; J Nemes; P Heini; T Steffen
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2003-04-01       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  An ex vivo biomechanical evaluation of a hydroxyapatite cement for use with kyphoplasty.

Authors:  S M Belkoff; J M Mathis; H Deramond; L E Jasper
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2001 Jun-Jul       Impact factor: 3.825

5.  Augmentation improves human cadaveric vertebral body compression mechanics for lumbar total disc replacement.

Authors:  Jonathon H Yoder; Joshua D Auerbach; Philip M Maurer; Erik M Erbe; Dean Entrekin; Richard A Balderston; Rudolf Bertagnoli; Dawn M Elliott
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2010-04-20       Impact factor: 3.468

6.  Adjacent vertebral failure after vertebroplasty: a biomechanical study of low-modulus PMMA cement.

Authors:  Andreas Boger; Paul Heini; Markus Windolf; Erich Schneider
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2007-08-23       Impact factor: 3.134

7.  Effects of the method of apatite seed crystals addition on setting reaction of α-tricalcium phosphate based apatite cement.

Authors:  Kanji Tsuru; Michito Maruta; Shigeki Matsuya; Kunio Ishikawa
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2015-09-28       Impact factor: 3.896

8.  Calcium-phosphate-silicate composite bone cement: self-setting properties and in vitro bioactivity.

Authors:  Zhiguang Huan; Jiang Chang
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2008-11-26       Impact factor: 3.896

Review 9.  Controversial issues in kyphoplasty and vertebroplasty in osteoporotic vertebral fractures.

Authors:  Ioannis D Papanastassiou; Andreas Filis; Maria A Gerochristou; Frank D Vrionis
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2014-03-04       Impact factor: 3.411

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.