Literature DB >> 10072174

Radiation-induced breakpoint misrejoining in human chromosomes: random or non-random?

K L Johnson1, D J Brenner, J Nath, J D Tucker, C R Geard.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To investigate whether radiation-induced misrejoining of chromosome breakpoints is randomly or non-randomly distributed throughout the human genome.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Data were combined from as many published cytogenetic studies as possible. The percentage of radiation-induced breaks per megabase (Mb) of DNA between all human chromosomes was calculated, and the observed and expected numbers of breakpoints based on DNA content between and within chromosomes were compared.
RESULTS: A DNA-proportional distribution of breakpoints in 14 autosomes and a statistically significant deviation from proportionality in the other eight autosomes and the sex chromosomes was found. Regression analysis showed no significant change in breakpoint frequency per Mb of DNA relative to autosome size. Analysis between chromosome arms showed a non-random distribution of induced breakpoints within certain autosomes, particularly the acrocentrics. In cases of non-random distributions, a prevalence of events was found at heterochromatic regions and/or telomeres, and a clustering of breakpoints was found near the centromeres of many chromosomes.
CONCLUSIONS: There is an approximately linear proportionality between autosomal DNA content and observed breakpoint number, suggesting that subsets of autosomes can be used to estimate accurately the overall genomic frequency of misrejoined breakpoints contingent upon a carefully selected subset. However, this conclusion may not apply to the sex chromosomes. The results also support the influence of chromatin organization and/or preferential DNA repair/misrejoining on the distribution of induced breakpoints. However, these effects are not sufficient at a global level to dismiss the value of cytogenetic analysis using a genome subset for biodosimetry.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10072174     DOI: 10.1080/095530099140582

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Radiat Biol        ISSN: 0955-3002            Impact factor:   2.694


  7 in total

1.  Analysis of X-ray-induced aberrations in human chromosome 5 using high-resolution multicolour banding FISH (mBAND).

Authors:  C Johannes; I Chudoba; G Obe
Journal:  Chromosome Res       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 5.239

2.  Fluorescence in situ hybridization is necessary to detect an association between chromosome aberrations and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon exposure in utero and reveals nonrandom chromosome involvement.

Authors:  Kirsti A Bocskay; Manuela A Orjuela; Deliang Tang; Xinhua Liu; Dorothy Warburton; Frederica P Perera
Journal:  Environ Mol Mutagen       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 3.216

3.  Different DNA-PKcs functions in the repair of radiation-induced and spontaneous DSBs within interstitial telomeric sequences.

Authors:  Déborah Revaud; Luis M Martins; François D Boussin; Laure Sabatier; Chantal Desmaze
Journal:  Chromosoma       Date:  2011-02-26       Impact factor: 4.316

4.  Multicolor FISH analysis of chromosomal breaks, duplications, deletions, and numerical abnormalities in the sperm of healthy men.

Authors:  E D Sloter; X Lowe; D H Moore II; J Nath; A J Wyrobek
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2000-08-28       Impact factor: 11.025

5.  Diagnostic X-ray examinations and increased chromosome translocations: evidence from three studies.

Authors:  Parveen Bhatti; Lee C Yong; Michele M Doody; Dale L Preston; Diane M Kampa; Marilyn J Ramsey; Elizabeth M Ward; Alan A Edwards; Elaine Ron; James D Tucker; Alice J Sigurdson
Journal:  Radiat Environ Biophys       Date:  2010-07-03       Impact factor: 1.925

6.  Frequent induction of chromosomal aberrations in in vivo skin fibroblasts after allogeneic stem cell transplantation: hints to chromosomal instability after irradiation.

Authors:  G Massenkeil; P Zschieschang; G Thiel; P G Hemmati; V Budach; B Dörken; J Pross; R Arnold
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2015-12-30       Impact factor: 3.481

7.  The Potential Effect of Different Doses of Ionizing Radiation on Genes and Disease.

Authors:  Cheng-Chia Lin; Lawrence Shih-Hsin Wu; Kuei-Fang Lee
Journal:  Dose Response       Date:  2019-05-05       Impact factor: 2.658

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.