Literature DB >> 10071701

Pain assessment and management in critically ill postoperative and trauma patients: a multisite study.

K C Carroll1, P J Atkins, G R Herold, C A Mlcek, M Shively, P Clopton, D N Glaser.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Pain in critically ill patients is undertreated.
OBJECTIVES: To examine patients' perceptions of pain and acute pain management practices in a large metropolitan area to provide direction for improvements in pain relief.
METHODS: In a descriptive, correlational study, data were collected from 213 patients in 13 hospitals. Interviews with patients, chart reviews, and interviews with nurse leaders were used to examine institutional and individual approaches to pain management.
RESULTS: Twenty-eight percent of patients did not recall an explanation of a pain management plan, and 64% were often in moderate to severe pain while in the intensive care unit. High pain intensity correlated with wait for an analgesic (P < .001), expectations of less pain (P < .001), and longer stay in the intensive care unit (P < .001). Low satisfaction correlated with expectations of less pain (P < .001), often being in moderate to severe pain (P < .001), and long wait for an analgesic (P < .001). In the first 24 hours postoperatively, only 54% of patients had a numerical pain rating documented; 91% had a pain description. The amount of opioid given on postoperative day 1 was influenced by pain intensity (P < .001), the patient's age (P = .03), type of surgery (P = .002), and route of analgesic (P < .001). Only 33% of patients had nonpharmacological pain interventions documented.
CONCLUSIONS: Despite moderate to severe pain, patients are generally satisfied with their pain relief. Measuring patients' satisfaction alone is not a reliable outcome for determining the effectiveness of pain management. Realistic expectations of patients about their pain may enhance coping, increase satisfaction, and decrease pain intensity after surgery.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10071701

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Crit Care        ISSN: 1062-3264            Impact factor:   2.228


  10 in total

1.  Predictors and use of nonpharmacologic interventions for procedural pain associated with turning among hospitalized adults.

Authors:  Bonnie Faigeles; Jill Howie-Esquivel; Christine Miaskowski; Julie Stanik-Hutt; Carol Thompson; Cheri White; Lorie Rietman Wild; Kathleen Puntillo
Journal:  Pain Manag Nurs       Date:  2010-07-03       Impact factor: 1.929

2.  Assessment of peri-extubation pain by visual analogue scale in the adult intensive care unit: a prospective observational study.

Authors:  Arnaud Gacouin; Christophe Camus; Yves Le Tulzo; Sylvain Lavoue; Jérome Hoff; Thomas Signouret; Arnaud Person; Rémi Thomas
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2004-02-26       Impact factor: 17.440

Review 3.  Pain management in neurocritical care.

Authors:  Axel Petzold; Armand Girbes
Journal:  Neurocrit Care       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 3.210

4.  Tapentadol immediate release: a new treatment option for acute pain management.

Authors:  Marc Afilalo; Jens-Ulrich Stegmann; David Upmalis
Journal:  J Pain Res       Date:  2010-02-08       Impact factor: 3.133

5.  Sedation in the intensive care unit with remifentanil/propofol versus midazolam/fentanyl: a randomised, open-label, pharmacoeconomic trial.

Authors:  Bernd Muellejans; Thomas Matthey; Joachim Scholpp; Markus Schill
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2006-06-15       Impact factor: 9.097

6.  Pupillary reflex measurement predicts insufficient analgesia before endotracheal suctioning in critically ill patients.

Authors:  Jerome Paulus; Antoine Roquilly; Hélène Beloeil; Julien Théraud; Karim Asehnoune; Corinne Lejus
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2013-07-24       Impact factor: 9.097

Review 7.  Pain management in trauma: A review study.

Authors:  Alireza Ahmadi; Shahrzad Bazargan-Hejazi; Zahra Heidari Zadie; Pramote Euasobhon; Penkae Ketumarn; Ali Karbasfrushan; Javad Amini-Saman; Reza Mohammadi
Journal:  J Inj Violence Res       Date:  2016-07-07

8.  Electronic audit and feedback intervention with action implementation toolbox to improve pain management in intensive care: protocol for a laboratory experiment and cluster randomised trial.

Authors:  Wouter T Gude; Marie-José Roos-Blom; Sabine N van der Veer; Evert de Jonge; Niels Peek; Dave A Dongelmans; Nicolette F de Keizer
Journal:  Implement Sci       Date:  2017-05-25       Impact factor: 7.327

9.  Analgesia and sedation in the intensive care unit: an overview of the issues.

Authors:  Curtis N Sessler; Wolfram Wilhelm
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2008-05-14       Impact factor: 9.097

10.  Quality improvement activity for improving pain management in acute extremity injuries in the emergency department.

Authors:  Hyung Lan Chang; Jin Hee Jung; Young Ho Kwak; Do Kyun Kim; Jin Hee Lee; Jae Yun Jung; Hyuksool Kwon; So Hyun Paek; Joong Wan Park; Jonghwan Shin
Journal:  Clin Exp Emerg Med       Date:  2018-03-30
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.