Literature DB >> 10071684

Monitoring of intracranial compliance: correction for a change in body position.

A Raabe1, M Czosnyka, I Piper, V Seifert.   

Abstract

The objectives of our study were 1. to investigate whether the intracranial compliance changes with body position; 2. to test if the pressure-volume index (PVI) calculation is affected by different body positions; 3. to define the optimal parameter to correct PVI for changes in body position and 4. to investigate the physiological meaning of the constant term (P0) in the model of the intracranial volume-pressure relationship. Thirteen patients were included in this study. All patients were subjected to 2 to 3 different body positions. In each position, either classic bolus injection was performed for measurement of intracranial compliance and calculation of PVI or the new Spiegelberg compliance monitor was used to calculate PVI continuously. Four different models were used for calculating the constant pressure term P0 and the P0 corrected PVI values. Pressure volume index not corrected for the constant term P0 significantly decreased with elevating the patients head (r = 0.70, p < 0.0001). In contrast, volume-pressure response and ICP pulse amplitude did not change with position. Using the constant term P0 to correct the PVI we found no changes between the different body positions. Our results suggest that during the variation in body position there is no change in intracranial compliance but a change in hydrostatic offset pressure which causes a shifting of the volume-pressure curve along the pressure axis without its shape being affected. PVI measurements should either be performed only with the patient in the 0 degree recumbent position or that the PVI calculation should be corrected for the hydrostatic difference between the level of the ICP transducer and the hydrostatic indifference point of the craniospinal system close to the third thoracic vertebra.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10071684     DOI: 10.1007/s007010050263

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Neurochir (Wien)        ISSN: 0001-6268            Impact factor:   2.216


  6 in total

1.  Brain compliance: the old story with a new 'et cetera'.

Authors:  Marek Czosnyka; Giuseppe Citerio
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2012-04-18       Impact factor: 17.440

2.  Determination of cranio-spinal canal compliance distribution by MRI: Methodology and early application in idiopathic intracranial hypertension.

Authors:  Rong-Wen Tain; Ahmet M Bagci; Byron L Lam; Evelyn M Sklar; Birgit Ertl-Wagner; Noam Alperin
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2011-10-03       Impact factor: 4.813

Review 3.  [Intracranial pressure-volume relationship. Physiology and pathophysiology].

Authors:  K Zweckberger; O W Sakowitz; A W Unterberg; K L Kiening
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 1.041

Review 4.  Monitoring and interpretation of intracranial pressure.

Authors:  M Czosnyka; J D Pickard
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 10.154

5.  A stochastic differential equation analysis of cerebrospinal fluid dynamics.

Authors:  Kalyan Raman
Journal:  Fluids Barriers CNS       Date:  2011-01-18

6.  Is posture-related craniospinal compliance shift caused by jugular vein collapse? A theoretical analysis.

Authors:  Manuel Gehlen; Vartan Kurtcuoglu; Marianne Schmid Daners
Journal:  Fluids Barriers CNS       Date:  2017-02-16
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.