Literature DB >> 10071401

The relationship between census-derived socio-economic variables and general practice consultation rates in three town centre practices.

R Carlisle1, S Johnstone.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The relationship between socio-economic factors and consultation rates is important in determining resource allocation to general practices. AIM: To determine the relationship between general practice surgery consultation rates and census-derived socio-economic variables for patients receiving the same primary and secondary care.
METHOD: A retrospective analysis was taken of computerized records in three general practices in Mansfield, North Nottinghamshire, with 29,142 patients spread over 15 electoral wards (Jarman score range from -23 to +25.5). Linear regression analysis of surgery consultation rates at ward and enumeration district levels was performed against Jarman and Townsend deprivation scores and census socio-economic variables.
RESULTS: Both the Townsend score (r2 = 59%) and the Jarman score (r2 = 39%) were associated with surgery consultation rates at ward level. The Townsend score had a stronger association than the Jarman score because all four of its component variables were individually associated with increased consultations compared with four out of eight Jarman components.
CONCLUSIONS: Even in practices not eligible for deprivation payments there were appreciable differences in consultation rates between areas with different socio-economic characteristics. The results suggest that the variables used to determine deprivation payments should be reconsidered, and they support suggestions that payments should be introduced at a lower level of deprivation and administered on an enumeration district basis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 10071401      PMCID: PMC1313243     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Gen Pract        ISSN: 0960-1643            Impact factor:   5.386


  19 in total

Review 1.  The Black report on socioeconomic inequalities in health 10 years on.

Authors:  G D Smith; M Bartley; D Blane
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1990 Aug 18-25

2.  Second thoughts on the Jarman index.

Authors:  G D Smith
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1991-02-16

3.  Designing a deprivation payment for general practitioners: the UPA(8) wonderland.

Authors:  R A Carr-Hill; T Sheldon
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1991-02-16

4.  Underprivileged areas and health care planning: implications of use of Jarman indicators of urban deprivation.

Authors:  R J Talbot
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1991-02-16

5.  Socioeconomic deprivation and health and the ecological fallacy.

Authors:  K MacRae
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1994-12-03

6.  Underprivileged areas: validation and distribution of scores.

Authors:  B Jarman
Journal:  Br Med J (Clin Res Ed)       Date:  1984-12-08

7.  Use of survey data and small area statistics to assess the link between individual morbidity and neighbourhood deprivation.

Authors:  S E Curtis
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  1990-03       Impact factor: 3.710

8.  Prediction of general practice workload from census based social deprivation scores.

Authors:  Y Ben-Shlomo; I White; P M McKeigue
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  1992-10       Impact factor: 3.710

9.  Allocating census data to general practice populations: implications for study of prescribing variation at practice level.

Authors:  G Scrivener; D C Lloyd
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1995-07-15

10.  Deprivation and general practitioner workload.

Authors:  R Balarajan; P Yuen; D Machin
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1992-02-29
View more
  7 in total

1.  How much does self-reported health status, measured by the SF-36, vary between electoral wards with different Jarman and Townsend scores?

Authors:  P Marsh; R Carlisle; A J Avery
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 5.386

Review 2.  Rural deprivation: reflecting reality.

Authors:  J C Farmer; A G Baird; L Iversen
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 5.386

3.  Patient's quality of life and coping style influence general practitioner's management in men with lower urinary tract symptoms: the Krimpen Study.

Authors:  Esther T Kok; Arthur M Bohnen; J L H Ruud Bosch; Siep Thomas; Frans P M J Groeneveld
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2006-07-07       Impact factor: 4.147

4.  Do single handed practices offer poorer care? Cross sectional survey of processes and outcomes.

Authors:  J Hippisley-Cox; M Pringle; C Coupland; V Hammersley; A Wilson
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2001-08-11

5.  Conducting a critical interpretive synthesis of the literature on access to healthcare by vulnerable groups.

Authors:  Mary Dixon-Woods; Debbie Cavers; Shona Agarwal; Ellen Annandale; Antony Arthur; Janet Harvey; Ron Hsu; Savita Katbamna; Richard Olsen; Lucy Smith; Richard Riley; Alex J Sutton
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2006-07-26       Impact factor: 4.615

6.  A randomised controlled trial of a lengthened and multi-disciplinary consultation model in a socially deprived community: a study protocol.

Authors:  David L Whitford; Wai-Sun Chan
Journal:  BMC Fam Pract       Date:  2007-06-28       Impact factor: 2.497

7.  Are low and high utilization related to the way GPs manage their practices? An observational study.

Authors:  W A de Graaf-Ruizendaal; L van der Hoek; D H de Bakker
Journal:  BMC Fam Pract       Date:  2018-04-25       Impact factor: 2.497

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.