PURPOSE: To evaluate the activity and toxicity of the combination of cisplatin (80 mg/m2 day 1) and vinorelbine (25 mg/m2 days 1 and 8) in patients with carcinoma of the uterine cervix that has not been previously treated with chemotherapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Fifty patients with cervical cancer were enrolled onto this study (27 stage IB-III, 23 stage IVB-recurrent). A two-stage optimal Simon design was applied. Thirteen responders of 29 treated patients were required to proceed beyond the first stage, and 28 responders were needed overall. RESULTS: Hematologic toxicity was mild, with neutropenia being the most frequent side effect. Nonhematologic toxicity was frequent but never severe; one patient had grade 3 peripheral neurotoxicity. Objective responses were recorded for 32 patients (64%): 11 patients (22%) achieved a complete response (CR) and 21 patients (42%) achieved a partial response (PR). The response rate was 81.5% in patients with IB-III stage (25.9% CR rate) and 43.5% in patients with IVB-recurrent disease (17.4% CR rate). Responses were seen both in stage IVB patients (one CR and two PRs, for an overall rate of 37.5%) and in patients with recurrent disease (three CRs + four PRs, for an overall rate of 46.7%). CONCLUSION: The combination of cisplatin and vinorelbine is an active regimen in the treatment of patients with early-stage and advanced carcinoma of the uterine cervix. The hematologic and nonhematologic toxicity of this combination is mild.
PURPOSE: To evaluate the activity and toxicity of the combination of cisplatin (80 mg/m2 day 1) and vinorelbine (25 mg/m2 days 1 and 8) in patients with carcinoma of the uterine cervix that has not been previously treated with chemotherapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Fifty patients with cervical cancer were enrolled onto this study (27 stage IB-III, 23 stage IVB-recurrent). A two-stage optimal Simon design was applied. Thirteen responders of 29 treated patients were required to proceed beyond the first stage, and 28 responders were needed overall. RESULTS: Hematologic toxicity was mild, with neutropenia being the most frequent side effect. Nonhematologic toxicity was frequent but never severe; one patient had grade 3 peripheral neurotoxicity. Objective responses were recorded for 32 patients (64%): 11 patients (22%) achieved a complete response (CR) and 21 patients (42%) achieved a partial response (PR). The response rate was 81.5% in patients with IB-III stage (25.9% CR rate) and 43.5% in patients with IVB-recurrent disease (17.4% CR rate). Responses were seen both in stage IVB patients (one CR and two PRs, for an overall rate of 37.5%) and in patients with recurrent disease (three CRs + four PRs, for an overall rate of 46.7%). CONCLUSION: The combination of cisplatin and vinorelbine is an active regimen in the treatment of patients with early-stage and advanced carcinoma of the uterine cervix. The hematologic and nonhematologic toxicity of this combination is mild.
Authors: David Cella; Helen Q Huang; Bradley J Monk; Lari Wenzel; Jo Benda; D Scott McMeekin; David Cohn; Lois Ramondetta; Cecelia H Boardman Journal: Gynecol Oncol Date: 2010-09-15 Impact factor: 5.482
Authors: John K Chan; Wei Deng; Robert V Higgins; Krishnansu S Tewari; Albert J Bonebrake; Michael Hicks; Stephanie Gaillard; Pedro T Ramirez; Weldon Chafe; Bradley J Monk; Carol Aghajanian Journal: Gynecol Oncol Date: 2017-07-18 Impact factor: 5.482
Authors: M Mare; R Maisano; N Caristi; V Adamo; G Altavilla; R Carboni; S Munaò; F La Torre Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2003-05-16 Impact factor: 3.603
Authors: Carlos Lopez-Graniel; Rigoberto Dolores; Lucely Cetina; Aaron Gonzalez; David Cantu; Jose Chanona; Jesus Uribe; Myrna Candelaria; Rocio Brom; Jaime de la Garza; Alfonso Duenas-Gonzalez Journal: BMC Cancer Date: 2005-09-19 Impact factor: 4.430
Authors: Myrna Candelaria; Lucely Cetina; Alicia Garcia-Arias; Carlos Lopez-Graniel; Jaime de la Garza; Elizabeth Robles; Alfonso Duenas-Gonzalez Journal: World J Surg Oncol Date: 2006-11-13 Impact factor: 2.754