PURPOSE: With the use of the pattern reversal visual evoked potential and the motor reaction time, we sought to differentiate anisometropic amblyopia from strabismic amblyopia on the basis of the visual transmission time. METHODS: Pattern reversal visual evoked potentials and motor reaction times were obtained in nine normal subjects, eight anisometropic and seven strabismic amblyopes. RESULTS: Our results show that while the peak time of the pattern visual evoked potential in anisometropic amblyopia and strabismic amblyopia was significantly delayed, it could not distinguish the two types of amblyopia. In contrast, a significantly longer interocular increment in strabismics compared to anisometropes was found with the reaction time, but not with the pattern visual evoked potential. CONCLUSION: Our findings thus show that it is possible to distinguish strabismic from anisometropic amblyopes using interocular differences in reaction time measurements. Our results bring support to the contention that the two types of amblyopia represent different neural abnormalities.
PURPOSE: With the use of the pattern reversal visual evoked potential and the motor reaction time, we sought to differentiate anisometropic amblyopia from strabismic amblyopia on the basis of the visual transmission time. METHODS: Pattern reversal visual evoked potentials and motor reaction times were obtained in nine normal subjects, eight anisometropic and seven strabismic amblyopes. RESULTS: Our results show that while the peak time of the pattern visual evoked potential in anisometropic amblyopia and strabismic amblyopia was significantly delayed, it could not distinguish the two types of amblyopia. In contrast, a significantly longer interocular increment in strabismics compared to anisometropes was found with the reaction time, but not with the pattern visual evoked potential. CONCLUSION: Our findings thus show that it is possible to distinguish strabismic from anisometropic amblyopes using interocular differences in reaction time measurements. Our results bring support to the contention that the two types of amblyopia represent different neural abnormalities.