Literature DB >> 10071026

A practical approach to evaluate the potential donor pool and trends in cadaveric kidney donation.

A O Ojo1, R A Wolfe, A B Leichtman, D M Dickinson, F K Port, E W Young.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The potential supply of transplantable cadaver kidneys is often expressed as donors per million population (pmp), which ignores some essential factors governing organ donation.
METHODS: We performed a modeled analysis of kidney donor extraction rates by age, gender, race, cause of death, geographic region, and year in a cohort of evaluable deaths and actual cadaver donors between the ages of 1 and 65 years (1988-1993). Evaluable death was defined as an in-hospital death in patients between the ages of 1 and 65 years whose ICD-9-CM cause of death was not an obvious contraindication to kidney donation. The main outcome measures were the crude donation rate and an adjusted donor extraction rate (DER) per 1000 evaluable deaths.
RESULTS: A total of 1.4x10(6) in-hospital deaths produced 300,502 evaluable deaths and 20,575 actual donors. Between 1989 and 1993, DER increased from 61.1 to 75 per 1,000 evaluable deaths. DERs were highest among the youngest age groups, declining significantly with age from 405.0 to 16.7/1,000 evaluable deaths for age groups 1-10 and 56-65 years, respectively. There was a small difference in donors pmp between blacks and whites (15 vs. 18). In contrast, DER was seven times higher in whites compared with blacks (112.5 vs. 16.5/1,000 evaluable deaths; P<0.001). The crude donation rate (per 1,000 evaluable deaths) was high for stroke (604.8) and trauma-related deaths (230.6), resulting in highly efficient donor extraction from these deaths. Region-specific DERs ranged from 49.4 to 83/1,000 evaluable deaths and differed significantly from the corresponding donors pmp.
CONCLUSIONS: Estimating kidney donation relative to in-hospital evaluable deaths is a meaningful measure of organ procurement efficiency. Efforts to enhance cadaveric kidney donation should seek to understand and reduce the marked demographic and regional disparity in donor extraction rates.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10071026     DOI: 10.1097/00007890-199902270-00011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Transplantation        ISSN: 0041-1337            Impact factor:   4.939


  6 in total

Review 1.  Development of organ-specific donor risk indices.

Authors:  Sanjeev K Akkina; Sumeet K Asrani; Yi Peng; Peter Stock; W Ray Kim; Ajay K Israni
Journal:  Liver Transpl       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 5.799

2.  Optimizing Graft Survival by Pretreatment of the Donor.

Authors:  Sandy Feng
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2017-02-17       Impact factor: 8.237

3.  Using a standardized donor ratio to assess the performance of organ procurement organizations.

Authors:  Sheryl Stogis; Richard A Hirth; Robert L Strawderman; Jane Banaszak-Holl; Dean G Smith
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 3.402

4.  The impact of donor policies in Europe: a steady increase, but not everywhere.

Authors:  Remco Coppen; Roland D Friele; Sjef K M Gevers; Geke A Blok; Jouke van der Zee
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2008-11-13       Impact factor: 2.655

5.  Potential organ-donor supply and efficiency of organ procurement organizations.

Authors:  Edward Guadagnoli; Cindy L Christiansen; Carol L Beasley
Journal:  Health Care Financ Rev       Date:  2003

6.  Deceased organ donation for transplantation: Challenges and opportunities.

Authors:  Raffaele Girlanda
Journal:  World J Transplant       Date:  2016-09-24
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.