BACKGROUND: Although the emerging complementary DNA (cDNA) array technology holds great promise to discern complex patterns of gene expression, its novelty means that there are no well-established standards to guide analysis and interpretation of the data that it produces. We have used preliminary data generated with the CLONTECH Atlas human cDNA array to develop a practical approach to the statistical analysis of these data by studying changes in gene expression during the development of acquired tamoxifen resistance in breast cancer. METHODS: For hybridization to the array, we prepared RNA from MCF-7 human breast cell tumors, isolated from our athymic nude mouse xenograft model of acquired tamoxifen resistance during estrogen-stimulated, tamoxifen-sensitive, and tamoxifen-resistant growth. Principal components analysis was used to identify genes with altered expression. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: Principal components analysis yielded three principal components that are interpreted as 1) the average level of gene expression, 2) the difference between estrogen-stimulated gene expression and the average of tamoxifen-sensitive and tamoxifen-resistant gene expression, and 3) the difference between tamoxifen-sensitive and tamoxifen-resistant gene expression. A bivariate (second and third principal components) 99% prediction region was used to identify outlier genes that exhibit altered expression. Two representative outlier genes, erk-2 and HSF-1 (heat shock transcription factor-1), were chosen for confirmatory study, and their predicted relative expression levels were confirmed in western blot analysis, suggesting that semiquantitative estimates are possible with array technology. IMPLICATIONS: Principal components analysis provides a useful and practical method to analyze gene expression data from a cDNA array. The method can identify broad patterns of expression alteration and, based on a small simulation study, will likely provide reasonable power to detect moderate-sized alterations in clinically relevant genes.
BACKGROUND: Although the emerging complementary DNA (cDNA) array technology holds great promise to discern complex patterns of gene expression, its novelty means that there are no well-established standards to guide analysis and interpretation of the data that it produces. We have used preliminary data generated with the CLONTECH Atlas human cDNA array to develop a practical approach to the statistical analysis of these data by studying changes in gene expression during the development of acquired tamoxifen resistance in breast cancer. METHODS: For hybridization to the array, we prepared RNA from MCF-7 humanbreast cell tumors, isolated from our athymic nude mouse xenograft model of acquired tamoxifen resistance during estrogen-stimulated, tamoxifen-sensitive, and tamoxifen-resistant growth. Principal components analysis was used to identify genes with altered expression. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: Principal components analysis yielded three principal components that are interpreted as 1) the average level of gene expression, 2) the difference between estrogen-stimulated gene expression and the average of tamoxifen-sensitive and tamoxifen-resistant gene expression, and 3) the difference between tamoxifen-sensitive and tamoxifen-resistant gene expression. A bivariate (second and third principal components) 99% prediction region was used to identify outlier genes that exhibit altered expression. Two representative outlier genes, erk-2 and HSF-1 (heat shock transcription factor-1), were chosen for confirmatory study, and their predicted relative expression levels were confirmed in western blot analysis, suggesting that semiquantitative estimates are possible with array technology. IMPLICATIONS: Principal components analysis provides a useful and practical method to analyze gene expression data from a cDNA array. The method can identify broad patterns of expression alteration and, based on a small simulation study, will likely provide reasonable power to detect moderate-sized alterations in clinically relevant genes.
Authors: K Fellenberg; N C Hauser; B Brors; A Neutzner; J D Hoheisel; M Vingron Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2001-09-04 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: M Heishi; J Ichihara; R Teramoto; Y Itakura; K Hayashi; H Ishikawa; H Gomi; J Sakai; M Kanaoka; M Taiji; T Kimura Journal: Diabetologia Date: 2006-05-23 Impact factor: 10.122
Authors: L C Dorssers; S Van der Flier; A Brinkman; T van Agthoven; J Veldscholte; E M Berns; J G Klijn; L V Beex; J A Foekens Journal: Drugs Date: 2001 Impact factor: 9.546
Authors: Joseph C Roden; Brandon W King; Diane Trout; Ali Mortazavi; Barbara J Wold; Christopher E Hart Journal: BMC Bioinformatics Date: 2006-04-07 Impact factor: 3.169
Authors: Britta M Jacobsen; Jennifer K Richer; Carol A Sartorius; Kathryn B Horwitz Journal: J Mammary Gland Biol Neoplasia Date: 2003-07 Impact factor: 2.673