Literature DB >> 10070796

An objective function for radiation treatment optimization based on local biological measures.

M Alber1, F Nüsslin.   

Abstract

The implementation of biological optimization of radiation treatment plans is impeded by both computational and modelling problems. We derive an objective function from basic model assumptions which includes the normal tissue constraints as interior penalty functions. For organs that are composed of parallel subunits, a mean response model is proposed which leads to constraints similar to dose-volume constraints. This objective function is convex in the case when no parallel organs lie in the treatment volume. Otherwise, an argument is given to show that a number of local minima may exist which are near degenerate to the global minimum. Thus, together with the measure quality of the objective function, highly efficient gradient algorithms can be used. The number of essential biological model parameters could be reduced to a minimum. However, if the optimization constraints are given as TCP/NTCP values, Lagrange multiplier updates have to be performed by invoking comprehensive biological models.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10070796     DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/44/2/014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Med Biol        ISSN: 0031-9155            Impact factor:   3.609


  10 in total

1.  Clinical relevance of different dose calculation strategies for mediastinal IMRT in Hodgkin's disease.

Authors:  J Koeck; Y Abo-Madyan; H T Eich; F Stieler; J Fleckenstein; J Kriz; R-P Mueller; F Wenz; F Lohr
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2012-06-29       Impact factor: 3.621

2.  A comparison of dose-response characteristics of four NTCP models using outcomes of radiation-induced optic neuropathy and retinopathy.

Authors:  Vitali Moiseenko; William Y Song; Loren K Mell; Niranjan Bhandare
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2011-06-06       Impact factor: 3.481

3.  On the visualization of universal degeneracy in the IMRT problem.

Authors:  Markus L Alber; Gustav Meedt
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2006-12-18       Impact factor: 3.481

4.  On the performances of different IMRT Treatment Planning Systems for selected paediatric cases.

Authors:  Antonella Fogliata; Giorgia Nicolini; Markus Alber; Mats Asell; Alessandro Clivio; Barbara Dobler; Malin Larsson; Frank Lohr; Friedlieb Lorenz; Jan Muzik; Martin Polednik; Eugenio Vanetti; Dirk Wolff; Rolf Wyttenbach; Luca Cozzi
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2007-02-15       Impact factor: 3.481

5.  Monte Carlo vs. pencil beam based optimization of stereotactic lung IMRT.

Authors:  Marcin Sikora; Jan Muzik; Matthias Söhn; Martin Weinmann; Markus Alber
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2009-12-12       Impact factor: 3.481

6.  A fast radiotherapy paradigm for anal cancer with volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT).

Authors:  Florian Stieler; Dirk Wolff; Frank Lohr; Volker Steil; Yasser Abo-Madyan; Friedlieb Lorenz; Frederik Wenz; Sabine Mai
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2009-10-25       Impact factor: 3.481

7.  The technical design and concept of a PET/CT linac for biology-guided radiotherapy.

Authors:  Oluwaseyi M Oderinde; Shervin M Shirvani; Peter D Olcott; Gopinath Kuduvalli; Samuel Mazin; David Larkin
Journal:  Clin Transl Radiat Oncol       Date:  2021-04-17

8.  Different IMRT solutions vs. 3D-conformal radiotherapy in early stage Hodgkin's Lymphoma: dosimetric comparison and clinical considerations.

Authors:  Christian Fiandra; Andrea Riccardo Filippi; Paola Catuzzo; Angela Botticella; Patrizia Ciammella; Pierfrancesco Franco; Valeria Casanova Borca; Riccardo Ragona; Santi Tofani; Umberto Ricardi
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2012-11-02       Impact factor: 3.481

9.  Impact of MLC properties and IMRT technique in meningioma and head-and-neck treatments.

Authors:  Steffi Kantz; Matthias Söhn; Almut Troeller; Michael Reiner; Helmut Weingandt; Markus Alber; Claus Belka; Ute Ganswindt
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2015-09-02       Impact factor: 3.481

10.  Efficiency of biological versus physical optimization for single-arc VMAT for prostate and head and neck cases.

Authors:  Vadzim Pyshniak; Irina Fotina; Alena Zverava; Stanislau Siamkouski; Elena Zayats; Georgy Kopanitsa; Dzmitry Okuntsau
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2014-07-08       Impact factor: 2.102

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.