Literature DB >> 10070466

Unilateral fenestration in the treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis.

D C Mackay1, E F Wheelwright.   

Abstract

The results of decompression by fenestration restricted to the clinically relevant level and side in 50 cases of spinal stenosis are presented. Forty-two patients underwent unilateral and 37 single level procedures. The mean follow-up time was 32 months. Patient assessment of outcome was: 32% excellent, 28% good, 28% fair, 4% marginal and 8% poor. This is comparable to published series. Two patients developed contralateral leg symptoms during the study. MRI showed neither case to be due to progressive stenosis. It is proposed that fenestration type surgery restricted to the clinically relevant level and side provides adequate spinal decompression whilst minimizing the extent of the surgical intervention.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 10070466     DOI: 10.1080/02688699844420

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Neurosurg        ISSN: 0268-8697            Impact factor:   1.596


  8 in total

1.  Midterm outcome after unilateral approach for bilateral decompression of lumbar spinal stenosis: 5-year prospective study.

Authors:  Halit Cavuşoğlu; Ramazan Alper Kaya; Osman Nuri Türkmenoglu; Cengiz Tuncer; Ibrahim Colak; Yunus Aydin
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2007-08-22       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 2.  [Lumbar spinal stenosis].

Authors:  T L Schulte; V Bullmann; T Lerner; M Schneider; B Marquardt; U Liljenqvist; T A Pietilä; L Hackenberg
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 1.087

3.  Spinal canal morphology and clinical outcomes of microsurgical bilateral decompression via a unilateral approach for lumbar spinal canal stenosis.

Authors:  Won-Seok Choi; Chang Hyun Oh; Gyu Yeul Ji; Sung Chan Shin; Jang-Bo Lee; Dong-Hyuk Park; Tai-Hyoung Cho
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2013-12-01       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 4.  Lumbar spinal stenosis: syndrome, diagnostics and treatment.

Authors:  Eberhard Siebert; Harald Prüss; Randolf Klingebiel; Vieri Failli; Karl M Einhäupl; Jan M Schwab
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurol       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 42.937

5.  A less invasive surgical approach in the lumbar lateral recess stenosis: direct approach to the medial wall of the pedicle.

Authors:  Ahmet Colak; Kivanç Topuz; Murat Kutlay; Serdar Kaya; Hakan Simşek; Ahmet Cetinkal; Mehmet N Demircan
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2008-10-01       Impact factor: 3.134

6.  Health-related quality of life following decompression compared to decompression and fusion for degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis: a Canadian multicentre study.

Authors:  Y Raja Rampersaud; Charles Fisher; Albert Yee; Marcel F Dvorak; Joel Finkelstein; Eugene Wai; Edward Abraham; Stephen J Lewis; David Alexander; William Oxner
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 2.089

7.  Minimum 3-year outcomes in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis after bilateral microdecompression by unilateral or bilateral laminotomy.

Authors:  Sang-Mi Yang; Hyung-Ki Park; Jae-Chil Chang; Ra-Sun Kim; Sukh-Que Park; Sung-Jin Cho
Journal:  J Korean Neurosurg Soc       Date:  2013-09-30

8.  Outcome after Surgery of Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: A Randomized Comparison of Bilateral Laminotomy, Trumpet Laminectomy, and Conventional Laminectomy.

Authors:  Kaveh Haddadi; Hamid Reza Ganjeh Qazvini
Journal:  Front Surg       Date:  2016-04-08
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.