Literature DB >> 10070441

The differential effect of the level of spinal cord stimulation on patients with advanced peripheral vascular disease in the lower limbs.

A W Ghajar1, J B Miles.   

Abstract

Percutaneous spinal cord stimulation (SCS) (Medtronic model 3487A PISCES-Quad lead) was carried out in 10 patients with rest pain from advanced peripheral vascular disease of the lower limb, who were unsuitable for conventional treatment. Trial stimulation ranged from 1-20 weeks and was associated with pain relief in nine of the patients. Claudication distance was improved in six patients. Trophic lesions improved in one patient with small artery disease. Spinal cord stimulation did not reverse the course of acute gangrenous lesions. The distal arterial pressure measured by Doppler Ankle/Brachial Pressure Index, (ABPI), showed no change. The capillary blood flow and skin temperature of both feet, measured, respectively, by Laser Doppler flowmetry and skin thermistor, showed a tendency to decrease when the stimulation was at the higher level, above T10, compared with an increase when the stimulation was at the lower level T12. Transcutaneous oxygen tension monitoring of the symptomatic foot showed an increase in four out of five patients. Pain relief was not dependent on circulatory changes, but it was more significant when the circulatory changes showed an impressive increase in the blood flow. The mechanism of these circulatory changes is probably by modulation of the sympathetic nervous system. Recognition of the optimal sitting of SCS may be critical in the clinical use of this technique, which seems to be a valuable option in the treatment of patients with advanced peripheral vascular disease (PVD).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 10070441     DOI: 10.1080/02688699844583

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Neurosurg        ISSN: 0268-8697            Impact factor:   1.596


  4 in total

1.  Treatment of urinary voiding dysfunction syndromes with spinal cord stimulation.

Authors:  Alexander E Yakovlev; Beth E Resch
Journal:  Clin Med Res       Date:  2010-03

2.  Spinal cord stimulation as a treatment option for intractable neuropathic cancer pain.

Authors:  Alexander E Yakovlev; Yakub Ellias
Journal:  Clin Med Res       Date:  2008-12

Review 3.  Putative mechanisms behind effects of spinal cord stimulation on vascular diseases: a review of experimental studies.

Authors:  Mingyuan Wu; Bengt Linderoth; Robert D Foreman
Journal:  Auton Neurosci       Date:  2008-02-29       Impact factor: 3.145

4.  Treatment of Chronic Back and Chest Pain in a Patient with Sickle Cell Disease Using Spinal Cord Stimulation

Authors:  Damla Yürük; İbrahim Aşık
Journal:  Turk J Haematol       Date:  2018-06-18       Impact factor: 1.831

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.