Literature DB >> 10070297

Relative survival in elderly cancer patients in Europe. EUROCARE Working Group.

M Vercelli1, A Quaglia, C Casella, S Parodi, R Capocaccia, C Martinez Garcia.   

Abstract

In this paper different patterns of survival by age and gender are presented for 17 European countries which participated in the EUROCARE II programme. Survival data were available for 701,521 patients aged between 65 and 99 years from 44 population-based cancer registries. Age-standardised relative survival rates at 1 and 5 years from diagnosis were computed. Relative risks (RRs) of death for those aged between 65 and 99 years compared with those aged between 55 and 64 years were estimated by gender and country. In general, the elderly had a large survival disadvantage, particularly 1 year after diagnosis and in women. Poorer survival rates in the elderly were observed for patients from Eastern European countries for almost all sites. However, relative survival of the elderly with respect to younger patients was similar in the different geographic areas. The results are in agreement with other population-based studies, confirming a worse prognosis for the elderly in both sexes. This may be explained by changes in biology and the natural history of the tumour and the occurrence of severe comorbidities, potentially affecting preventive, diagnostic and therapeutic strategies. The lack of equality in providing adequate treatment to elderly cancer patients should be addressed as a matter of urgency by health-care providers.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 10070297     DOI: 10.1016/s0959-8049(98)00325-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Cancer        ISSN: 0959-8049            Impact factor:   9.162


  9 in total

1.  US mortality in an international context: age variations.

Authors:  Jessica Y Ho; Samuel H Preston
Journal:  Popul Dev Rev       Date:  2010

2.  Inequalities in survival from colorectal cancer: a comparison of the impact of deprivation, treatment, and host factors on observed and cause specific survival.

Authors:  H Wrigley; P Roderick; S George; J Smith; M Mullee; J Goddard
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 3.710

Review 3.  First-line treatment strategies for elderly patients with metastatic colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Hielke J Meulenbeld; Geert-Jan Creemers
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 3.923

Review 4.  Management of colorectal cancer in elderly patients: focus on the cost of chemotherapy.

Authors:  Matthew J Matasar; Vijaya Sundararajan; Victor R Grann; Alfred I Neugut
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 3.923

5.  Adjuvant chemotherapy in older women (ACTION) study - what did we learn from the pilot phase?

Authors:  R Leonard; R Ballinger; D Cameron; P Ellis; L Fallowfield; M Gosney; L Johnson; L S Kilburn; A Makris; J Mansi; M Reed; A Ring; A Robinson; P Simmonds; G Thomas; J M Bliss
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2011-10-11       Impact factor: 7.640

6.  Optimising surgical management of elderly cancer patients.

Authors:  Hodigere Sripathy Jois Ramesh; Daniel Pope; Roberto Gennari; Riccardo A Audisio
Journal:  World J Surg Oncol       Date:  2005-03-23       Impact factor: 2.754

Review 7.  Risk assessment for cancer surgery in elderly patients.

Authors:  Hodigere S J Ramesh; Tom Boase; Riccardo A Audisio
Journal:  Clin Interv Aging       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 4.458

8.  Age-specific cancer survival in Estonia: recent trends and data quality.

Authors:  Kaire Innos; Katrin Lang; Kersti Pärna; Tiiu Aareleid
Journal:  Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2015-07-29       Impact factor: 4.790

9.  Patient-Centered Time-at-Home Outcomes in Older Adults After Surgical Cancer Treatment.

Authors:  Tyler R Chesney; Barbara Haas; Natalie G Coburn; Alyson L Mahar; Victoria Zuk; Haoyu Zhao; Frances C Wright; Amy T Hsu; Julie Hallet
Journal:  JAMA Surg       Date:  2020-11-18       Impact factor: 14.766

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.