Literature DB >> 10069796

Regional differences in the recovery course of tachycardia-induced changes of atrial electrophysiological properties.

S H Lee1, F Y Lin, W C Yu, J J Cheng, P Kuan, C R Hung, M S Chang, S A Chen.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Regional differences in recovery of tachycardia-induced changes of atrial electrophysiological properties have not been well studied. METHODS AND
RESULTS: In the control group (5 dogs), atrial effective refractory period (AERP) and inducibility of atrial fibrillation (AF) were assessed before and every 4 hours for 48 hours after complete atrioventricular junction (AVJ) ablation with 8-week VVI pacing. In experimental group 1 (15 dogs), AERP and inducibility of AF were assessed before and after complete AVJ ablation with 8-week rapid right atrial (RA) pacing (780 bpm) and VVI pacing. In experimental group 2 (7 dogs), AERP and inducibility of AF were assessed before and after 8-week rapid left atrial (LA) pacing and VVI pacing. AERP and inducibility and duration of AF were obtained from 7 epicardial sites. In the control group, atrial electrophysiological properties obtained immediately and during 48-hour measurements after pacing did not show any change. In the 2 experimental groups, recovery of atrial electrophysiological properties included a progressive recovery of AERP shortening, recovery of AERP maladaptation, and decrease of duration and episodes of reinduced AF. However, recovery of shortening and maladaptation of AERP and inducibility of AF was slower at the LA than at the RA and Bachmann's bundle.
CONCLUSIONS: The LA had a slower recovery of tachycardia-induced changes of atrial electrophysiological properties, and this might play a critical role in initiation of AF.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10069796     DOI: 10.1161/01.cir.99.9.1255

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Circulation        ISSN: 0009-7322            Impact factor:   29.690


  7 in total

Review 1.  Cardiac Remodeling After Atrial Fibrillation Ablation.

Authors:  Li-Wei Lo; Shih-Ann Chen
Journal:  J Atr Fibrillation       Date:  2013-06-30

Review 2.  Differences of BiAtrial Substrate Properties in Patients with Different Types of AF.

Authors:  Kazuyoshi Suenari; Hidekazu Hirao; Mitsunori Okamoto; Yasuki Kihara; Shih-Ann Chen
Journal:  J Atr Fibrillation       Date:  2012-12-16

3.  Early versus late atrial fibrillation after atrial flutter ablation.

Authors:  Emmanuel Loutrianakis; Tawfik Barakat; Brian Olshansky
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 1.900

4.  Electrophysiological differences between the epicardium and the endocardium of the left atrium.

Authors:  Yoav Michowitz; Shiro Nakahara; Tara Bourke; Eric Buch; Marmar Vaseghi; Carlos De Diego; Isaac Wiener; Aman Mahajan; Kalyanam Shivkumar
Journal:  Pacing Clin Electrophysiol       Date:  2010-10-14       Impact factor: 1.976

Review 5.  The results of pacing trials for the prevention and termination of atrial tachyarrhythmias: is there any evidence of therapeutic breakthrough?

Authors:  Irina Savelieva; A John Camm
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 1.900

Review 6.  The role of action potential alternans in the initiation of atrial fibrillation in humans: a review and future directions.

Authors:  Michael R Franz; Sameer M Jamal; Sanjiv M Narayan
Journal:  Europace       Date:  2012-11       Impact factor: 5.214

7.  Patient-specific simulations predict efficacy of ablation of interatrial connections for treatment of persistent atrial fibrillation.

Authors:  Caroline H Roney; Steven E Williams; Hubert Cochet; Rahul K Mukherjee; Louisa O'Neill; Iain Sim; John Whitaker; Orod Razeghi; George J Klein; Edward J Vigmond; Mark O'Neill; Steven A Niederer
Journal:  Europace       Date:  2018-11-01       Impact factor: 5.214

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.