Literature DB >> 10069478

Safety evaluation of phytosterol esters. Part 1. Assessment of oestrogenicity using a combination of in vivo and in vitro assays.

V A Baker1, P A Hepburn, S J Kennedy, P A Jones, L J Lea, J P Sumpter, J Ashby.   

Abstract

Phytosterols are natural constituents of the human diet, and as part of an extensive programme of safety evaluation studies investigating their use as a novel food ingredient, the possible oestrogenic effects of phytosterols have been investigated using a combination of in vitro and in vivo assays. Competitive binding with the immature rat uterine oestrogen receptor (ER) has been used to measure the ability of phytosterols to bind to ERs while the transcriptional activation of oestrogen-responsive genes has been examined in an oestrogen-inducible yeast screen. Phytosterols did not display any activity in these in vitro assays. Uterotrophic assays have been conducted to investigate the potential for phytosterols to elicit an oestrogenic response when administered orally to immature female rats (n = 10) at doses of 0, 5, 50 or 500 mg/kg/day for 3 consecutive days. Phytosterols (a well characterized mixture of beta-sitosterol, campesterol and stigmasterol) and phytosterol esters (the previous phytosterol mixture esterified with fatty acids from sunflower oil) did not exhibit oestrogenic activity in the immature female rat using uterine wet weight as the endpoint. Beta-oestradiol (0.4 mg/kg/day) consistently produced a significant increase in uterus weights. Coumestrol (a known phytoestrogen) was also tested as a weak positive control and produced a dose response at doses of 20, 40 and 80 mg/kg/day in the uterotrophic assay. In conclusion, we have shown that phytosterols do not bind to the ER and do not stimulate transcriptional activity of the human ER in a recombinant yeast strain. In addition, there was no indication of oestrogenicity from the uterotrophic assay when the material was administered by oral gavage to immature female rats.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10069478     DOI: 10.1016/s0278-6915(98)00101-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Food Chem Toxicol        ISSN: 0278-6915            Impact factor:   6.023


  14 in total

Review 1.  Phytosterols and human lipid metabolism: efficacy, safety, and novel foods.

Authors:  Marie-Pierre St-Onge; Peter J H Jones
Journal:  Lipids       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 1.880

2.  Reproductive effects of Ficus asperifolia (Moraceae) in female rats.

Authors:  Pierre Watcho; Esther Ngadjui; Nkeng-Efouet P Alango; Nguelefack T Benoît; Albert Kamanyi
Journal:  Afr Health Sci       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 0.927

3.  Herbal supplements: cause for concern?

Authors:  Paolo Borrione; Luigi Di Luigi; Nicola Maffulli; Fabio Pigozzi
Journal:  J Sports Sci Med       Date:  2008-12-01       Impact factor: 2.988

Review 4.  The effect of phytoestrogens on the female genital tract.

Authors:  J L Burton; M Wells
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 3.411

5.  Dietary flavonol intake is associated with age of puberty in a longitudinal cohort of girls.

Authors:  Nancy A Mervish; Eliza W Gardiner; Maida P Galvez; Larry H Kushi; Gayle C Windham; Frank M Biro; Susan M Pinney; Michael E Rybak; Susan L Teitelbaum; Mary S Wolff
Journal:  Nutr Res       Date:  2013-05-31       Impact factor: 3.315

Review 6.  The Lipid-lowering Effects and Associated Mechanisms of Dietary Phytosterol Supplementation.

Authors:  Jerad H Dumolt; Todd C Rideout
Journal:  Curr Pharm Des       Date:  2017       Impact factor: 3.116

7.  Nutritional flavonoids impact on nuclear and extranuclear estrogen receptor activities.

Authors:  Paola Galluzzo; Maria Marino
Journal:  Genes Nutr       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 5.523

Review 8.  Plant sterols as anticancer nutrients: evidence for their role in breast cancer.

Authors:  Bruce J Grattan
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2013-01-31       Impact factor: 5.717

Review 9.  Plant sterols as dietary adjuvants in the reduction of cardiovascular risk: theory and evidence.

Authors:  Craig S Patch; Linda C Tapsell; Peter G Williams; Michelle Gordon
Journal:  Vasc Health Risk Manag       Date:  2006

Review 10.  The breast cancer and the environment research centers: transdisciplinary research on the role of the environment in breast cancer etiology.

Authors:  Robert A Hiatt; Sandra Z Haslam; Janet Osuch
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2009-06-16       Impact factor: 9.031

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.