Literature DB >> 10068692

Using imperfect secondary structure predictions to improve molecular structure computations.

C C Chen1, J P Singh, R B Altman.   

Abstract

MOTIVATION: Until ab initio structure prediction methods are perfected, the estimation of structure for protein molecules will depend on combining multiple sources of experimental and theoretical data. Secondary structure predictions are a particularly useful source of structural information, but are currently only approximately 70% correct, on average. Structure computation algorithms which incorporate secondary structure information must therefore have methods for dealing with predictions that are imperfect. EXPERIMENTS PERFORMED: We have modified our algorithm for probabilistic least squares structural computations to accept 'disjunctive' constraints, in which a constraint is provided as a set of possible values, each weighted with a probability. Thus, when a helix is predicted, the distances associated with a helix are given most of the weight, but some weights can be allocated to the other possibilities (strand and coil). We have tested a variety of strategies for this weighting scheme in conjunction with a baseline synthetic set of sparse distance data, and compared it with strategies which do not use disjunctive constraints.
RESULTS: Naive interpretations in which predictions were taken as 100% correct led to poor-quality structures. Interpretations that allow disjunctive constraints are quite robust, and even relatively poor predictions (58% correct) can significantly increase the quality of computed structures (almost halving the RMS error from the known structure).
CONCLUSIONS: Secondary structure predictions can be used to improve the quality of three-dimensional structural computations. In fact, when interpreted appropriately, imperfect predictions can provide almost as much improvement as perfect predictions in three-dimensional structure calculations.

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10068692     DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/15.1.53

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bioinformatics        ISSN: 1367-4803            Impact factor:   6.937


  7 in total

1.  Using surface envelopes to constrain molecular modeling.

Authors:  Jonathan M Dugan; Russ B Altman
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 6.725

2.  On the relation between the predicted secondary structure and the protein size.

Authors:  Lukasz Kurgan
Journal:  Protein J       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 2.371

3.  Prediction of protein secondary structure by mining structural fragment database.

Authors:  Haitao Cheng; Taner Z Sen; Andrzej Kloczkowski; Dimitris Margaritis; Robert L Jernigan
Journal:  Polymer (Guildf)       Date:  2005-05-26       Impact factor: 4.430

4.  A reexamination of correlations of amino acids with particular secondary structures.

Authors:  Sasa N Malkov; Miodrag V Zivković; Milos V Beljanski; Srdan D Stojanović; Snezana D Zarić
Journal:  Protein J       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 2.371

5.  A reexamination of the propensities of amino acids towards a particular secondary structure: classification of amino acids based on their chemical structure.

Authors:  Sasa N Malkov; Miodrag V Zivković; Milos V Beljanski; Michael B Hall; Snezana D Zarić
Journal:  J Mol Model       Date:  2008-05-27       Impact factor: 1.810

6.  A comparison of different functions for predicted protein model quality assessment.

Authors:  Juan Li; Huisheng Fang
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2016-08-03       Impact factor: 3.686

7.  Application of data mining tools for classification of protein structural class from residue based averaged NMR chemical shifts.

Authors:  Arun V Kumar; Rehana F M Ali; Yu Cao; V V Krishnan
Journal:  Biochim Biophys Acta       Date:  2015-03-07
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.