Literature DB >> 10067915

Variability in lesion location after microelectrode-guided pallidotomy for Parkinson's disease: anatomical, physiological, and technical factors that determine lesion distribution.

R E Gross1, W J Lombardi, W D Hutchison, S Narula, J A Saint-Cyr, J O Dostrovsky, R R Tasker, A E Lang, A M Lozano.   

Abstract

OBJECT: To understand the factors that determine the distribution of lesions after microelectrode-guided pallidotomy for Parkinson's disease, the authors quantitatively characterized lesion location in a cohort of patients who were prospectively followed to determine the effects of pallidotomy on clinical outcome.
METHODS: Thirty-three patients underwent volumetric magnetic resonance (MR) imaging after surgery to allow quantitative lesion localization in relation to conventional intraventricular landmarks and, alternatively, more anatomically relevant landmarks. The validity of the method was verified in a cohort of postpallidotomy patients who underwent concurrent volumetric and stereotactic MR imaging in an external head frame. Lesions were distributed over a considerable distance in the anteroposterior (8.8 mm) and mediolateral (8.7 mm) dimensions in relation to the anterior commissure and wall of the third ventricle, respectively. Less variation was seen in lesion location in the dorsoventral dimension (4.8 mm) in relation to the intercommissural plane.
CONCLUSIONS: Lesion distribution was not random: lesion locations in the anteroposterior and mediolateral dimensions were highly correlated, such that lesions were distributed from anteromedial to posterolateral, parallel to the border of the globus pallidus internus with the obliquely oriented internal capsule. The factors that led to variability in lesion location were variation in third ventricle width and the oblique anteromedial-to-posterolateral course of the internal capsule. This demonstration of variability of lesion location in a cohort of patients who experienced excellent clinical benefits and minimal postoperative complications emphasizes the importance of anatomical variations in determining lesion position and the need for physiological corroboration for correct lesion placement.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10067915     DOI: 10.3171/jns.1999.90.3.0468

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosurg        ISSN: 0022-3085            Impact factor:   5.115


  5 in total

Review 1.  Deep brain stimulation: overview and update.

Authors:  Martin L Bootin
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2006-09-02       Impact factor: 2.502

2.  What's in a "smile?" Intra-operative observations of contralateral smiles induced by deep brain stimulation.

Authors:  Michael S Okun; Dawn Bowers; Utaka Springer; Nathan A Shapira; Donald Malone; Ali R Rezai; Bart Nuttin; Kenneth M Heilman; Robert J Morecraft; Steven A Rasmussen; Benjamin D Greenberg; Kelly D Foote; Wayne K Goodman
Journal:  Neurocase       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 0.881

Review 3.  What happened to posteroventral pallidotomy for Parkinson's disease and dystonia?

Authors:  Robert E Gross
Journal:  Neurotherapeutics       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 7.620

4.  Microelectrode-guided technique for treatment of Parkinson's diseases.

Authors:  Jian Chen; Zhengmin Yang; Dongsheng Guo; Hongquan Niu
Journal:  J Huazhong Univ Sci Technolog Med Sci       Date:  2002

5.  Moving forward: advances in the treatment of movement disorders with deep brain stimulation.

Authors:  Terry K Schiefer; Joseph Y Matsumoto; Kendall H Lee
Journal:  Front Integr Neurosci       Date:  2011-11-09
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.