Literature DB >> 10067904

Low-weight neonatal survival paradox in the Czech Republic.

E Carlson1, J M Hoem.   

Abstract

Analysis of vital statistics for the Czech Republic between 1986 and 1993, including 3,254 infant deaths from 350,978 first births to married and single women who conceived at ages 18-29 years, revealed a neonatal survival advantage for low-weight infants born to disadvantaged (single, less educated) women, particularly for deaths from congenital anomalies. This advantage largely disappeared after the neonatal period. The same patterns have been observed for low-weight infants born to black women in the United States. Since the Czech Republic had an ethnically homogenous population, virtually universal prenatal care, and uniform institutional conditions for delivery, Czech results must be attributed to social rather than to biologic or medical circumstances. This strengthens the contention that in the United States, the black neonatal survival paradox may be due as much to race-related social stigmatization and consequent disadvantage as to any hypothesized hereditary influences on birth-weight-specific survival.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Americas; Biology; Birth Weight; Blacks; Body Weight; Comparative Studies; Cultural Background; Czech Republic; Demographic Factors; Developed Countries; Differential Mortality; Eastern Europe; Economic Factors; Ethnic Groups; Europe; Infant Mortality; Low Birth Weight; Mortality; Mortality Determinants; Neonatal Mortality; North America; Northern America; Physiology; Population; Population Characteristics; Population Dynamics; Research Methodology; Risk Factors; Socioeconomic Factors; Studies; United States

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10067904      PMCID: PMC2707749          DOI: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a009832

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Epidemiol        ISSN: 0002-9262            Impact factor:   4.897


  23 in total

1.  Why are neonatal mortality rates lower in small black infants than in white infants in similar birth weight?

Authors:  A F North; H M MacDonald
Journal:  J Pediatr       Date:  1977-05       Impact factor: 4.406

2.  Class, race, and infant mortality in the United States.

Authors:  C J Hogue; M A Hargraves
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1993-01       Impact factor: 9.308

3.  A note on the biologic concept of race and its application in epidemiologic research.

Authors:  R Cooper
Journal:  Am Heart J       Date:  1984-09       Impact factor: 4.749

4.  Racial differences in infant mortality by cause of death: the impact of birth weight and maternal age.

Authors:  I W Eberstein; J R Parker
Journal:  Demography       Date:  1984-08

5.  The risk of low birth weight. Alternative models of neonatal mortality.

Authors:  M E Tompkins; G R Alexander; K L Jackson; C A Hornung; J M Altekruse
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  1985-12       Impact factor: 4.897

6.  Differences in gestational age-specific birthweight among Chinese, Japanese and white Americans.

Authors:  X Wang; B Guyer; D M Paige
Journal:  Int J Epidemiol       Date:  1994-02       Impact factor: 7.196

7.  Birth prevalence of malformations in members of different ethnic groups and in the offspring of matings between them, in Birmingham, England.

Authors:  I Leck; R J Lancashire
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  1995-04       Impact factor: 3.710

8.  Birth weight-specific rates as a bias in the effects of smoking and other perinatal hazards.

Authors:  M Terrin; M B Meyer
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1981-11       Impact factor: 7.661

9.  Preterm delivery and low birth weight among first-born infants of black and white college graduates.

Authors:  G A McGrady; J F Sung; D L Rowley; C J Hogue
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  1992-08-01       Impact factor: 4.897

10.  Influence of paternal characteristics on the risk of low birth weight.

Authors:  J D Parker; K C Schoendorf
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  1992-08-15       Impact factor: 4.897

View more
  2 in total

1.  Trajectories of fetal loss in the Czech Republic.

Authors:  E Carlson; J M Hoem; J Rychtarikova
Journal:  Demography       Date:  1999-08

2.  Differences in birthweight outcomes: a longitudinal study based on siblings.

Authors:  Silvia Bacci; Francesco Bartolucci; Manuela Chiavarini; Liliana Minelli; Luca Pieroni
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 3.390

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.