Literature DB >> 10066854

Randomized, controlled trial to evaluate increased intensity of physiotherapy treatment of arm function after stroke.

N B Lincoln1, R H Parry, C D Vass.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND
PURPOSE: Many patients have impaired arm function after stroke, for which they receive physiotherapy. The aim of the study was to determine whether increasing the amount of physiotherapy early after stroke improved the recovery of arm function and to compare the effects of this therapy when administered by a qualified therapist or a trained, supervised assistant. The physiotherapy followed a typical British approach, which is Bobath derived. Ten hours of additional therapy were given over a 5-week period.
METHODS: The study design was a single-blind, randomized, controlled trial. Stroke patients were recruited from those admitted to the hospital in the 5 weeks after stroke. They were randomly allocated to routine physiotherapy, additional treatment by a qualified physiotherapist, or additional treatment by a physiotherapy assistant. Outcome was assessed after 5 weeks of treatment and at 3 and 6 months after stroke on measures of arm function and of independence in activities of daily living.
RESULTS: There were 282 patients recruited to the study. The median initial Barthel score was 6.5, and the median age of the patients was 73 years. The median initial Rivermead Motor Assessment Arm score was 1. There were no significant differences between the groups at randomization or on any of the outcome measures. Only half of the patients allocated to the 2 additional-therapy groups completed the program.
CONCLUSIONS: This increase in the amount of physiotherapy for arm impairment with a typical British approach given early after stroke did not significantly improve the recovery of arm function in the patients studied. A number of other studies of interventions aimed at rehabilitation of arm function have reported positive results. Such findings may have been due to the content of these interventions, to the greater intensity of the interventions, or to the selection of patients to whom the treatments were applied.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10066854     DOI: 10.1161/01.str.30.3.573

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stroke        ISSN: 0039-2499            Impact factor:   7.914


  35 in total

1.  Rehabilitation and Recovery After Stroke.

Authors: 
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Neurol       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 3.598

Review 2.  Clinical practice. Rehabilitation after stroke.

Authors:  Bruce H Dobkin
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2005-04-21       Impact factor: 91.245

3.  Comparison of Bobath based and movement science based treatment for stroke: a randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  P M van Vliet; N B Lincoln; A Foxall
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 10.154

4.  Constraint-induced movement therapy for severe upper-extremity impairment after stroke in an outpatient rehabilitation setting: a case report.

Authors:  Michelle Ploughman; Jennifer Shears; Lisa Hutchings; Michelle Osmond
Journal:  Physiother Can       Date:  2008-10-10       Impact factor: 1.037

5.  Non-pharmacological interventions for the improvement of post-stroke activities of daily living and disability amongst older stroke survivors: A systematic review.

Authors:  Carrie Stewart; Selvarani Subbarayan; Pamela Paton; Elliot Gemmell; Iosief Abraha; Phyo Kyaw Myint; Denis O'Mahony; Alfonso J Cruz-Jentoft; Antonio Cherubini; Roy L Soiza
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-10-04       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 6.  [Evidence-based arm rehabilitation--a systematic review of the literature].

Authors:  T Platz
Journal:  Nervenarzt       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 1.214

7.  Effects of intensive repetition of a new facilitation technique on motor functional recovery of the hemiplegic upper limb and hand.

Authors:  Kazumi Kawahira; Megumi Shimodozono; Seiji Etoh; Katsuya Kamada; Tomokazu Noma; Nobuyuki Tanaka
Journal:  Brain Inj       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 2.311

Review 8.  The effects of increased dose of exercise-based therapies to enhance motor recovery after stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Emma V Cooke; Kathryn Mares; Allan Clark; Raymond C Tallis; Valerie M Pomeroy
Journal:  BMC Med       Date:  2010-10-13       Impact factor: 8.775

9.  Robot-assisted upper and lower limb rehabilitation after stroke: walking and arm/hand function.

Authors:  Stefan Hesse; Jan Mehrholz; Cordula Werner
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2008-05-02       Impact factor: 5.594

10.  Introducing a feedback training system for guided home rehabilitation.

Authors:  Fabian Kohler; Thomas Schmitz-Rode; Catherine Disselhorst-Klug
Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil       Date:  2010-01-15       Impact factor: 4.262

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.