Literature DB >> 10065693

Do morphology and stage explain the inferior lung cancer survival in Denmark?

H H Storm1, P W Dickman, A Engeland, T Haldorsen, T Hakulinen.   

Abstract

Danish lung cancer patients diagnosed during 1983-1987 experienced 5-yr relative survival rates 2-7% inferior to patients in the other Nordic countries, despite the similarity of cancer registration and healthcare systems in the Nordic countries. Is the inferior relative survival in Denmark due to differences in morphology or stage of lung cancers? The present study compared in detail the survival of 92,719 patients diagnosed with lung cancer during 1978-1992 in Denmark, Finland, and Norway. In particular, differences in morphology and extent of disease were studied. A poor survival rate for small cell anaplastic lung carcinoma compared with all other morphologies was confirmed. However, this could not explain the relative survival differences observed between countries. Extent of disease was the most important predictor of survival. Part of the observed survival differences could be explained by a less favourable stage distribution in Denmark, combined with a slightly lower relative survival rate for those with metastatic disease. Differences in treatment are unlikely to explain the findings, although delays in diagnosing and treating patients in Denmark compared with neighbouring countries could partially explain the lower patient survival in Denmark. In conclusion, the main factor in the lower survival rate in Denmark is unfavourable stage distribution.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10065693     DOI: 10.1183/09031936.99.13243099

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Respir J        ISSN: 0903-1936            Impact factor:   16.671


  7 in total

1.  Does the organizational structure of health care systems influence care-seeking decisions? A qualitative analysis of Danish cancer patients' reflections on care-seeking.

Authors:  Rikke Sand Andersen; Peter Vedsted; Frede Olesen; Flemming Bro; Jens Søndergaard
Journal:  Scand J Prim Health Care       Date:  2011-08-23       Impact factor: 2.581

2.  Cancer survival in Australia, Canada, Denmark, Norway, Sweden, and the UK, 1995-2007 (the International Cancer Benchmarking Partnership): an analysis of population-based cancer registry data.

Authors:  M P Coleman; D Forman; H Bryant; J Butler; B Rachet; C Maringe; U Nur; E Tracey; M Coory; J Hatcher; C E McGahan; D Turner; L Marrett; M L Gjerstorff; T B Johannesen; J Adolfsson; M Lambe; G Lawrence; D Meechan; E J Morris; R Middleton; J Steward; M A Richards
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2010-12-21       Impact factor: 79.321

3.  Pancreatic cancer survival in central and northern Denmark from 1998 through 2009: a population-based cohort study.

Authors:  Deirdre P Cronin-Fenton; Rune Erichsen; Frank V Mortensen; Sarunas Dikinis; Mette Nørgaard; Jacob Jacobsen
Journal:  Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2011-07-20       Impact factor: 4.790

4.  Secondary care intervals before and after the introduction of urgent referral guidelines for suspected cancer in Denmark: a comparative before-after study.

Authors:  Mette Bach Larsen; Rikke Pilegaard Hansen; Dorte Gilså Hansen; Frede Olesen; Peter Vedsted
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2013-09-10       Impact factor: 2.655

5.  Effect of time interval from diagnosis to treatment for non-small cell lung cancer on survival: a national cohort study in Taiwan.

Authors:  Pei-Tseng Kung; Wen-Chen Tsai; Chang-Hung Tsai; Wei-Yin Kuo
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2020-04-22       Impact factor: 2.692

6.  Accelerated regrowth of non-small-cell lung tumours after induction chemotherapy.

Authors:  S Y El Sharouni; H B Kal; J J Battermann
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2003-12-15       Impact factor: 7.640

7.  Survival from cancer of the lung in England and Wales up to 2001.

Authors:  B Rachet; M J Quinn; N Cooper; M P Coleman
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2008-09-23       Impact factor: 7.640

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.