Literature DB >> 10065390

Atypical anorexia nervosa: separation from typical cases in course and outcome in a long-term prospective study.

M Strober1, R Freeman, W Morrell.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To assess differences in long-term course and outcome between typical and atypical cases of anorexia nervosa.
METHOD: A naturalistic, longitudinal prospective design was used to assess recovery, relapse, and onset of binge eating over 10 to 15 years in patients ascertained through a university-based specialty treatment program. Atypical anorexia nervosa was distinguished from the diagnostically prototypic form of the disorder based on the continuous absence of morbid fear of weight gain and body size distortion during the inpatient phase of treatment. Patients were assessed semiannually for 5 years then annually thereafter until the final visit.
RESULTS: Compared to pure cases of anorexia nervosa, atypical cases were less likely to drop weight after discharge, recovered more rapidly, and had lower cumulative risk for developing binge eating.
CONCLUSION: It has been argued recently that weight phobia and body image disturbance should not be viewed as critical to the diagnosis of anorexia nervosa. This study shows that the absence of these particular symptoms in patients presenting with malnutrition secondary to extreme dietary restriction predicts a less malignant course and outcome compared to typical cases of anorexia nervosa. These course differences suggest that the division of patients into typical versus atypical diagnostic subtypes may be nosologically valid and clinically useful.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10065390     DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1098-108x(199903)25:2<135::aid-eat2>3.0.co;2-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Eat Disord        ISSN: 0276-3478            Impact factor:   4.861


  8 in total

1.  A translational neuroscience approach to body image disturbance and its remediation in anorexia nervosa.

Authors:  Jamie Feusner; Rangaprakash Deshpande; Michael Strober
Journal:  Int J Eat Disord       Date:  2017-07-29       Impact factor: 4.861

Review 2.  Animal models of eating disorders.

Authors:  S F Kim
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2012-03-21       Impact factor: 3.590

3.  Instability of eating disorder diagnoses: prospective study.

Authors:  Gabriella Milos; Anja Spindler; Ulrich Schnyder; Christopher G Fairburn
Journal:  Br J Psychiatry       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 9.319

4.  Classification of feeding and eating disorders: review of evidence and proposals for ICD-11.

Authors:  Rudolf Uher; Michael Rutter
Journal:  World Psychiatry       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 49.548

5.  Characteristics and stability of empirically derived anorexia nervosa subtypes: towards the identification of homogeneous low-weight eating disorder phenotypes.

Authors:  Jennifer E Wildes; Kelsie T Forbush; Kristian E Markon
Journal:  J Abnorm Psychol       Date:  2013-11

Review 6.  The relationship between eating disorder not otherwise specified (EDNOS) and officially recognized eating disorders: meta-analysis and implications for DSM.

Authors:  Jennifer J Thomas; Lenny R Vartanian; Kelly D Brownell
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 17.737

Review 7.  Eating disorders in women.

Authors:  Pratap Sharan; A Shyam Sundar
Journal:  Indian J Psychiatry       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 1.759

8.  Psychometric properties of the eating disorder examination-questionnaire in Japanese adolescents.

Authors:  Tomoyo Mitsui; Toshiyuki Yoshida; Gen Komaki
Journal:  Biopsychosoc Med       Date:  2017-04-04
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.