Literature DB >> 10063930

Measurement of small intestinal permeability markers, lactulose, and mannitol in serum: results in celiac disease.

M A Cox1, K O Lewis, B T Cooper.   

Abstract

To date, tests of small intestinal passive permeability have involved the ingestion of test molecules whose permeation is assessed indirectly by measuring their urinary recovery. Excretion ratios of marker molecules (eg, lactulose-to-mannitol excretion ratio, LMER) are useful clinically. Measurement of permeability markers in serum would improve the convenience of the tests. Our aim was to assess small intestinal permeability in celiac patients using serum lactulose and mannitol levels with calculation of lactulose to mannitol serum ratios (LMSR) and to compare the results with the standard methods using urinary recoveries. Twenty-four newly diagnosed celiacs and 10 control subjects were studied; 10 celiacs were restudied while established on a gluten-free diet. Test subjects and patients ingested 10 g lactulose and 2.5 g mannitol in 50 ml water. In 10 untreated celiacs and the controls, blood was taken from 0 to 120 min and all urine was collected for 6 hr. The remaining 14 untreated and the 10 treated celiacs had a single serum sample taken 60 min after ingestion of the test solution. At 1 hr after ingestion, the mean mannitol level in normals (0.156 mmol/liter) was significantly higher than in untreated celiacs (0.06 mmol/liter). The 1-hr mean serum lactulose level in normals (0.125 micromol/liter) was significantly lower than in untreated celiacs (0.56 micromol/liter). The median 1-hr LMSR in untreated celiacs was 0.42 compared with 0.039 in normals and 0.08 in treated celiacs. There was a significant correlation between LMSR and LMER. Permeability testing using serum measurements of lactulose and mannitol gave comparable results in celiac patients to the tests using urinary recovery of the permeability markers and may prove to be more convenient, especially in pediatric patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10063930     DOI: 10.1023/a:1026679123148

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dig Dis Sci        ISSN: 0163-2116            Impact factor:   3.199


  20 in total

1.  Rapid and simultaneous determination of lactulose and mannitol in urine, by HPLC with pulsed amperometric detection, for use in studies of intestinal permeability.

Authors:  S C Fleming; M S Kapembwa; M F Laker; G E Levin; G E Griffin
Journal:  Clin Chem       Date:  1990-05       Impact factor: 8.327

Review 2.  Intestinal permeability: an overview.

Authors:  I Bjarnason; A MacPherson; D Hollander
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  1995-05       Impact factor: 22.682

3.  Intestinal permeability assessed by excretion ratios of two molecules: results in coeliac disease.

Authors:  I Cobden; R J Dickinson; J Rothwell; A T Axon
Journal:  Br Med J       Date:  1978-10-14

4.  Is the sugar intestinal permeability test a reliable investigation for coeliac disease screening?

Authors:  C Catassi; E Fabiani; I M Rätsch; A Bonucci; M Dotti; G V Coppa; P L Giorgi
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1997-02       Impact factor: 23.059

5.  Small intestinal permeability to mannitol, lactulose, and polyethylene glycol 400 in celiac disease.

Authors:  S O Ukabam; B T Cooper
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  1984-09       Impact factor: 3.199

6.  Cellobiose/mannitol sugar permeability test complements biopsy histopathology in clinical investigation of the jejunum.

Authors:  S Strobel; W G Brydon; A Ferguson
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1984-11       Impact factor: 23.059

7.  Small intestinal permeability as an indicator of jejunal mucosal recovery in patients with celiac sprue on a gluten-free diet.

Authors:  S O Ukabam; B T Cooper
Journal:  J Clin Gastroenterol       Date:  1985-06       Impact factor: 3.062

8.  Lactulose/mannitol test: an ideal screen for celiac disease.

Authors:  L D Juby; J Rothwell; A T Axon
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  1989-01       Impact factor: 22.682

9.  Urinary infection may invalidate the double-sugar test of intestinal permeability.

Authors:  J P Milnes; A J Walters; D J Andrews; T S Low-Beer
Journal:  Scand J Gastroenterol       Date:  1988-09       Impact factor: 2.423

10.  Intestinal permeability in children with Crohn's disease and coeliac disease.

Authors:  A D Pearson; E J Eastham; M F Laker; A W Craft; R Nelson
Journal:  Br Med J (Clin Res Ed)       Date:  1982-07-03
View more
  12 in total

1.  Increased intestinal permeability in inflammatory bowel diseases assessed by iohexol test.

Authors:  Vanya A Gerova; Simeon G Stoynov; Dimitar S Katsarov; Dobrin A Svinarov
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2011-05-07       Impact factor: 5.742

2.  Increased bacterial translocation in gluten-sensitive mice is independent of small intestinal paracellular permeability defect.

Authors:  Manuel A Silva; Jennifer Jury; Yolanda Sanz; Michelle Wiepjes; Xianxi Huang; Joseph A Murray; Chella S David; Alessio Fasano; Elena F Verdú
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2011-08-07       Impact factor: 3.199

3.  Intestinal permeability and diarrhoeal disease in Aboriginal Australians.

Authors:  R H Kukuruzovic; A Haase; K Dunn; A Bright; D R Brewster
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 3.791

4.  Intestinal mucosal permeability of children with cefaclor-associated serum sickness-like reactions.

Authors:  Zhen Zhang; Yun Xiang; Baoxiang Wang; Hongbo Chen; Xiaofang Cai; Xiaomei Wang; Lin Mei; Yi Zheng
Journal:  Eur J Pediatr       Date:  2013-01-08       Impact factor: 3.183

Review 5.  Intestinal permeability, leaky gut, and intestinal disorders.

Authors:  D Hollander
Journal:  Curr Gastroenterol Rep       Date:  1999-10

6.  Lactulose/mannitol test and specificity, sensitivity, and area under curve of intestinal permeability parameters in patients with liver cirrhosis and Crohn's disease.

Authors:  Milan Dastych; Milan Dastych; Hana Novotná; J Cíhalová
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2008-03-05       Impact factor: 3.199

7.  The effect of intestinal permeability and endotoxemia on the prognosis of acute pancreatitis.

Authors:  Young Yool Koh; Woo Kyu Jeon; Yong Kyun Cho; Hong Joo Kim; Won Gil Chung; Chang Uk Chon; Tae Yun Oh; Jun Ho Shin
Journal:  Gut Liver       Date:  2012-10-18       Impact factor: 4.519

8.  Polyethylene glycol versus dual sugar assay for gastrointestinal permeability analysis: is it time to choose?

Authors:  Kim van Wijck; Babs Afm Bessems; Hans Mh van Eijk; Wim A Buurman; Cornelis Hc Dejong; Kaatje Lenaerts
Journal:  Clin Exp Gastroenterol       Date:  2012-07-19

9.  Expression Pattern of Fatty Acid Binding Proteins in Celiac Disease Enteropathy.

Authors:  Natalia M Bottasso Arias; Marina García; Constanza Bondar; Luciana Guzman; Agustina Redondo; Nestor Chopita; Betina Córsico; Fernando G Chirdo
Journal:  Mediators Inflamm       Date:  2015-08-05       Impact factor: 4.711

10.  Effects of creep feeding and supplemental glutamine or glutamine plus glutamate (Aminogut) on pre- and post-weaning growth performance and intestinal health of piglets.

Authors:  Rafael A Cabrera; James L Usry; Consuelo Arrellano; Eduardo T Nogueira; Marianne Kutschenko; Adam J Moeser; Jack Odle
Journal:  J Anim Sci Biotechnol       Date:  2013-08-03
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.