Literature DB >> 10063632

Protective effect of bifidus milk on the experimental infection with Salmonella enteritidis subsp. typhimurium in conventional and gnotobiotic mice.

A M Silva1, E A Bambirra, A L Oliveira, P P Souza, D A Gomes, E C Vieira, J R Nicoli.   

Abstract

The ability of Bifidobacterium bifidum from a commercial bifidus milk to antagonize Salmonella enteritidis subsp. typhimurium in vivo, and to reduce the pathological consequences for the host, was determined using conventional and gnotobiotic mice. Conventional animals received daily, by gavage, 0.1 ml bifidus milk containing about 10(9) cfu B. bifidum and germ-free animals received a single 0.1 ml dose. The conventional and gnotobiotic groups were challenged orally with 10(2) cfu of the pathogenic bacteria 5 and/or 10 d after the beginning of treatment. Control groups were treated with milk. Bifidus milk protected both animal models against the challenge with the pathogenic bacteria, as demonstrated by survival and histopathological data. However, to obtain the protective effect in gnotobiotic animals, the treatment had to be initiated 10 d before the challenge. In experimental and control gnotobiotic mice, Salm. enteritidis subsp. typhimurium became similarly established at levels ranging from 10(8) to 10(9) viable cells g-1 of faeces and remained at these high levels until the animals died or were sacrificed. It was concluded that the protection against Salm. enteritidis subsp. typhimurium observed in conventional and gnotobiotic mice treated with bifidus milk was not due to the reduction of the intestinal populations of the pathogenic bacteria.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10063632     DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2672.1999.00674.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Appl Microbiol        ISSN: 1364-5072            Impact factor:   3.772


  9 in total

1.  Lactobacillus protected bone damage and maintained the antioxidant status of liver and kidney homogenates in female wistar rats.

Authors:  Sarika Amdekar; Avnish Kumar; Poonam Sharma; Rambir Singh; Vinod Singh
Journal:  Mol Cell Biochem       Date:  2012-06-04       Impact factor: 3.396

Review 2.  Proposed model: mechanisms of immunomodulation induced by probiotic bacteria.

Authors:  C Maldonado Galdeano; A de Moreno de LeBlanc; G Vinderola; M E Bibas Bonet; G Perdigón
Journal:  Clin Vaccine Immunol       Date:  2007-03-14

3.  Probiotic Activity of a Bacterial Strain Isolated from Ancient Permafrost Against Salmonella Infection in Mice.

Authors:  O Fursova; V Potapov; A Brouchkov; G Pogorelko; G Griva; N Fursova; S Ignatov
Journal:  Probiotics Antimicrob Proteins       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 4.609

4.  Lactobacillus casei reduces the inflammatory joint damage associated with collagen-induced arthritis (CIA) by reducing the pro-inflammatory cytokines: Lactobacillus casei: COX-2 inhibitor.

Authors:  Sarika Amdekar; Vinod Singh; Rambir Singh; Poonam Sharma; Poonam Keshav; Avnish Kumar
Journal:  J Clin Immunol       Date:  2010-09-14       Impact factor: 8.317

5.  Effects of a probiotic strain of Enterococcus faecium on the rate of natural chlamydia infection in swine.

Authors:  M Pollmann; M Nordhoff; A Pospischil; K Tedin; L H Wieler
Journal:  Infect Immun       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 3.441

6.  Divergent immunomodulating effects of probiotics on T cell responses to oral attenuated human rotavirus vaccine and virulent human rotavirus infection in a neonatal gnotobiotic piglet disease model.

Authors:  Kuldeep S Chattha; Anastasia N Vlasova; Sukumar Kandasamy; Gireesh Rajashekara; Linda J Saif
Journal:  J Immunol       Date:  2013-08-05       Impact factor: 5.422

7.  Probiotic bifidobacteria protect mice from lethal infection with Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli O157:H7.

Authors:  Takashi Asahara; Kensuke Shimizu; Koji Nomoto; Takashi Hamabata; Ayako Ozawa; Yoshifumi Takeda
Journal:  Infect Immun       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 3.441

8.  Antagonistic activity of Lactobacillus acidophilus LA10 against Salmonella enterica serovar Enteritidis SE86 in mice.

Authors:  Diane Scapin; Williani Fabiola Grando; Eliandra Mirlei Rossi; Karla Joseane Perez; Patrícia da Silva Malheiros; Eduardo Cesar Tondo
Journal:  Braz J Microbiol       Date:  2013-05-07       Impact factor: 2.476

Review 9.  The Human Gut Microbiome - A Potential Controller of Wellness and Disease.

Authors:  Zhi Y Kho; Sunil K Lal
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2018-08-14       Impact factor: 5.640

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.