Literature DB >> 10053088

Robot predators in virtual ecologies: the importance of memory in mimicry studies.

.   

Abstract

An important means of investigating gains and losses to prey caused by mimicry is through mathematical or computer constructs which represent and explore limited aspects of mimicry situations. Such studies use virtual predators which are usually simple automata, 'robots' that, through simple rules, vary virtual attack rates on virtual insect prey. In this paper I consider the effect of variations in predator memory and learning on mimicry dynamics. When there is mimicry between unequally noxious prey, the way that memory is modelled is shown to be crucial. If forgetting rates are fixed, an increase in the density of the least defended prey produces monotonic gains or losses in protection. However, if forgetting rate is inversely related in some way to degree of noxiousness of the prey then attack rates initially rise with the density of the least defended prey, reach a cusp and then fall. I show that the generation of this highly unconventional up-down result appears to be independent of variations in learning rate. This work shows how sensitive the predictions of virtual predators may be to relatively small changes in behavioural rules. Copyright 1999 The Association for the Study of Animal Behaviour.

Year:  1999        PMID: 10053088     DOI: 10.1006/anbe.1998.0943

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anim Behav        ISSN: 0003-3472            Impact factor:   2.844


  5 in total

1.  Testing Müllerian mimicry: an experiment with wild birds.

Authors:  M P Speed; N J Alderson; C Hardman; G D Ruxton
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2000-04-07       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  What kind of signals do mimetic tiger moths send? A phylogenetic test of wasp mimicry systems (Lepidoptera: Arctiidae: Euchromiini).

Authors:  Rebecca B Simmons; Susan J Weller
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2002-05-22       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 3.  Avian psychology and communication.

Authors:  Candy Rowe; John Skelhorn
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2004-07-22       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  Tasting the difference: do multiple defence chemicals interact in Müllerian mimicry?

Authors:  John Skelhorn; Candy Rowe
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2005-02-07       Impact factor: 5.349

5.  Optimal-foraging predator favors commensalistic Batesian mimicry.

Authors:  Atsushi Honma; Koh-ichi Takakura; Takayoshi Nishida
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2008-10-15       Impact factor: 3.240

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.