Literature DB >> 10053083

The effects of demonstrator social status and prior foraging success on social learning in laying hens.

.   

Abstract

Opportunities for social learning within a group of animals are likely to be influenced by the social dynamics of that group. Some individuals may be more influential demonstrators than others even when there are no differences in their skill level or performance. In this study of domestic hens, Gallus gallus domesticus, differences in demonstrator salience were examined. From 24 separate flocks we selected as demonstrators a dominant cockerel, a dominant hen, a mid-ranking hen or a subordinate hen. Demonstrators were pretrained to perform an operant discrimination task to obtain food. Six observers from each flock individually watched the demonstrator perform the task for four 5-min sessions held on consecutive days. On the fifth day observers were tested individually in the operant chamber. We analysed data from 19 flocks, where there were no quantitative differences in demonstrator performance. Observer hens of relatively high social status performed more correct operant pecks than observer hens of relatively low social status. Demonstrator category also had a significant effect on subsequent observer behaviour. Hens that had observed cockerels performed very few general pecks or operant pecks. Hens that had observed dominant hens performed more operant pecks, but hens that had observed sub-ordinate hens performed more general pecks in the chamber. The results suggested either that there was an interaction between dominance and gender in demonstrator salience or that dominant hens might have been influential because of some factor imperfectly associated with their dominance status. A possible candidate was the foraging ability of the dominant hens. In a second experiment using the same protocol, we manipulated the prior foraging success of dominant hens from four additional flocks but this had no significant effect on their subsequent influence as demonstrators. Copyright 1999 The Association for the Study of Animal Behaviour.

Entities:  

Year:  1999        PMID: 10053083     DOI: 10.1006/anbe.1998.0920

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anim Behav        ISSN: 0003-3472            Impact factor:   2.844


  29 in total

Review 1.  Distinguishing social and asocial learning using diffusion dynamics.

Authors:  Simon M Reader
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 1.986

2.  Development, direction, and damage limitation: social learning in domestic fowl.

Authors:  Christine J Nicol
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 1.986

Review 3.  Opportunities and constraints when studying social learning: Developmental approaches and social factors.

Authors:  Elizabeth V Lonsdorf; Kristin E Bonnie
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 1.986

Review 4.  How does cognition shape social relationships?

Authors:  Claudia A F Wascher; Ipek G Kulahci; Ellis J G Langley; Rachael C Shaw
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2018-09-26       Impact factor: 6.237

5.  Exploring individual and social learning in jackdaws (Corvus monedula).

Authors:  Ira G Federspiel; M Boeckle; A M P von Bayern; N J Emery
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2019-09       Impact factor: 1.986

6.  Chimpanzees' socially maintained food preferences indicate both conservatism and conformity.

Authors:  Lydia M Hopper; Steven J Schapiro; Susan P Lambeth; Sarah F Brosnan
Journal:  Anim Behav       Date:  2011-06-01       Impact factor: 2.844

7.  Selective attention to philopatric models causes directed social learning in wild vervet monkeys.

Authors:  Erica van de Waal; Nathalie Renevey; Camille Monique Favre; Redouan Bshary
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2010-03-17       Impact factor: 5.349

8.  The rise and fall of an arbitrary tradition: an experiment with wild meerkats.

Authors:  Alex Thornton; Aurore Malapert
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2009-02-17       Impact factor: 5.349

9.  Preferential learning from non-affiliated individuals in jackdaws (Corvus monedula).

Authors:  Christine Schwab; Thomas Bugnyar; Kurt Kotrschal
Journal:  Behav Processes       Date:  2008-07-12       Impact factor: 1.777

10.  Innovative individuals are not always the best demonstrators: feeding innovation and social transmission in Serinus canaria.

Authors:  Nicole Cadieu; Stéphane Fruchard; Jean-Claude Cadieu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-01-22       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.