Literature DB >> 10051293

In-stent neointimal proliferation correlates with the amount of residual plaque burden outside the stent: an intravascular ultrasound study.

F Prati1, C Di Mario, I Moussa, B Reimers, M T Mallus, A Parma, E Lioy, A Colombo.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to evaluate the relationship between residual plaque burden after coronary stent implantation and the development of late in-stent neointimal proliferation. METHODS AND
RESULTS: Between January 1996 and May 1997, 50 patients underwent intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) interrogation at 6+/-1.2 months after coronary stent implantation in native coronary arteries. IVUS images were acquired with a motorized pullback, and cross-sectional measurements were performed within the stents at 1-mm intervals. The following measurements were obtained: (1) lumen area (LA), (2) stent area (SA), (3) area delimited by the external elastic membrane (EEMA), (4) percent neointimal area calculated as (SA-LA/SA)x100, and (5) percent residual plaque area calculated as (EEMA-SA)/EEMAx100. Volume measurements within the stented segments were calculated by applying Simpson's rule. In the pooled data analysis of 876 cross sections, linear regression showed a significant positive correlation between percent residual plaque area and percent neointimal area (r=0.50, y= 45.03+0.29x, P<0.01). There was significant incremental increase in mean percent neointimal area for stepwise increase in percent residual plaque area. Mean percent neointimal area was 16.3+/-10.3% for lesions with a percent residual plaque area of <50% and 27.7+/-11% for lesions with a percent residual plaque area of >/=50% (P<0.001). The volumetric analysis showed that the percent residual plaque volume was significantly greater in restenotic lesions compared with nonrestenotic lesions (58.7+/-4.3% versus 51.4+/-5.7%, respectively; P<0.01).
CONCLUSIONS: Late in-stent neointimal proliferation has a direct correlation with the amount of residual plaque burden after coronary stent implantation, supporting the hypothesis that plaque removal before stent implantation may reduce restenosis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10051293     DOI: 10.1161/01.cir.99.8.1011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Circulation        ISSN: 0009-7322            Impact factor:   29.690


  6 in total

Review 1.  Current understanding of coronary in-stent restenosis. Pathophysiology, clinical presentation, diagnostic work-up, and management.

Authors:  T M Schiele
Journal:  Z Kardiol       Date:  2005-11

2.  Atherosclerotic plaque behind the stent changes after bare-metal and drug-eluting stent implantation in humans: Implications for late stent failure?

Authors:  Ioannis Andreou; Saeko Takahashi; Masaya Tsuda; Koki Shishido; Antonios P Antoniadis; Michail I Papafaklis; Shingo Mizuno; Ahmet U Coskun; Shigeru Saito; Charles L Feldman; Elazer R Edelman; Peter H Stone
Journal:  Atherosclerosis       Date:  2016-07-22       Impact factor: 5.162

3.  Correlation between high frequency intravascular ultrasound and histomorphology in human coronary arteries.

Authors:  F Prati; E Arbustini; A Labellarte; B Dal Bello; L Sommariva; M T Mallus; A Pagano; A Boccanelli
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 5.994

4.  Stent expansion: a combination of delivery balloon underexpansion and acute stent recoil reduces predicted stent diameter irrespective of reference vessel size.

Authors:  Shahid Aziz; John L Morris; Raphael A Perry; Rodney H Stables
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2007-05-04       Impact factor: 5.994

5.  Fenestrated stent graft repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm: hemodynamic analysis of the effect of fenestrated stents on the renal arteries.

Authors:  Zhonghua Sun; Thanapong Chaichana
Journal:  Korean J Radiol       Date:  2009-12-28       Impact factor: 3.500

6.  Comparative analysis of lumen enlargement mechanisms achieved with the bifurcation dedicated BiOSS) stent versus classical coronary stent implantations by means of provisional side branch stenting strategy: an intravascular ultrasound study.

Authors:  Robert J Gil; Jacek Bil; Aleksandra Michałek; Dobrin Vassiliev; Ricardo A Costa
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2013-07-19       Impact factor: 2.357

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.