R J Zarbo1, R E Nakhleh. 1. Department of Pathology, Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, Mich 48202, USA.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To survey the scope of current written institutional policies for types of surgical pathology specimens exempt from submission to the laboratory and those that may be examined by gross inspection only. DESIGN AND SETTING: In the first quarter of 1997, a total of 413 voluntary participant institutions enrolled in the College of American Pathologists Q-Probes quality improvement program completed a checklist of 115 proffered specimens. Also included was a questionnaire defining demographic, practice, and reimbursement variables. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The number and types of specimens exempt from submission and submitted for gross examination only based on written institutional policy rather than on unapproved actual practices. RESULTS: Most institutions had a written policy for types of specimens deemed exempt from submission to pathology (87.1 %) and for types of specimens subject to gross examination only (76.6%). There was a wide range of numbers of specimen types with a median number of 17 (range, 2-40) in the exempt category and 29 (range, 6-57) in the category of gross examination only. Significantly higher absolute counts of specimens exempt from submission to pathology were reported by institutions with a greater surgical pathology volume in 1996 and by nonteaching institutions. No aspect of practice was associated with numbers of specimens for gross examination only. CONCLUSIONS: This Q-Probes study creates a multi-institutional reference database of current practices to assist pathologists and clinical staff in the development of written guidelines pertaining to surgical pathology specimen submission exceptions and gross-only examinations.
OBJECTIVE: To survey the scope of current written institutional policies for types of surgical pathology specimens exempt from submission to the laboratory and those that may be examined by gross inspection only. DESIGN AND SETTING: In the first quarter of 1997, a total of 413 voluntary participant institutions enrolled in the College of American Pathologists Q-Probes quality improvement program completed a checklist of 115 proffered specimens. Also included was a questionnaire defining demographic, practice, and reimbursement variables. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The number and types of specimens exempt from submission and submitted for gross examination only based on written institutional policy rather than on unapproved actual practices. RESULTS: Most institutions had a written policy for types of specimens deemed exempt from submission to pathology (87.1 %) and for types of specimens subject to gross examination only (76.6%). There was a wide range of numbers of specimen types with a median number of 17 (range, 2-40) in the exempt category and 29 (range, 6-57) in the category of gross examination only. Significantly higher absolute counts of specimens exempt from submission to pathology were reported by institutions with a greater surgical pathology volume in 1996 and by nonteaching institutions. No aspect of practice was associated with numbers of specimens for gross examination only. CONCLUSIONS: This Q-Probes study creates a multi-institutional reference database of current practices to assist pathologists and clinical staff in the development of written guidelines pertaining to surgical pathology specimen submission exceptions and gross-only examinations.
Authors: Karthik A Ganapathi; Stefania Pittaluga; Oreofe O Odejide; Arnold S Freedman; Elaine S Jaffe Journal: Haematologica Date: 2014-09 Impact factor: 9.941
Authors: Roberto N Miranda; Tariq N Aladily; H Miles Prince; Rashmi Kanagal-Shamanna; Daphne de Jong; Luis E Fayad; Mitual B Amin; Nisreen Haideri; Govind Bhagat; Glen S Brooks; David A Shifrin; Dennis P O'Malley; Chan Y Cheah; Carlos E Bacchi; Gabriela Gualco; Shiyong Li; John A Keech; Ephram P Hochberg; Matthew J Carty; Summer E Hanson; Eid Mustafa; Steven Sanchez; John T Manning; Zijun Y Xu-Monette; Alonso R Miranda; Patricia Fox; Roland L Bassett; Jorge J Castillo; Brady E Beltran; Jan Paul de Boer; Zaher Chakhachiro; Dongjiu Ye; Douglas Clark; Ken H Young; L Jeffrey Medeiros Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2013-12-09 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Kirill A Lyapichev; Sergio Piña-Oviedo; L Jeffrey Medeiros; Mark G Evans; Hui Liu; Alonso R Miranda; Kelly K Hunt; Mark W Clemens; John M Stewart; Mitual B Amin; Andres E Quesada; Siaw Ming Chai; Arianna Di Napoli; Arthy Yoga; Sanat K Dave; Ignacio I Wistuba; Yun Wu; Carlos E Bueso-Ramos; Ellen J Schlette; Maria C Ferrufino-Schmidt; Sanam Loghavi; Joseph D Khoury; Ken H Young; Roberto N Miranda Journal: Mod Pathol Date: 2019-08-05 Impact factor: 7.842
Authors: Andrés E Quesada; L Jeffrey Medeiros; Mark W Clemens; Maria C Ferrufino-Schmidt; Sergio Pina-Oviedo; Roberto N Miranda Journal: Mod Pathol Date: 2018-09-11 Impact factor: 7.842