Literature DB >> 10050714

Pharmacokinetic dose adjustment of Erwinia asparaginase in protocol II of the paediatric ALL/NHL-BFM treatment protocols.

J P Vieira Pinheiro1, E Ahlke, U Nowak-Göttl, G Hempel, H J Müller, K Lümkemann, M Schrappe, B Rath, G Fleischhack, G Mann, J Boos.   

Abstract

Native forms of asparaginase stem from different biological sources. Previously reported data from children treated with Erwinase showed significantly lower trough levels and pharmacokinetic dose intensity than after E. coli-derived preparations. Hence, schedule optimization was initiated to achieve relevant serum activities. 21 children on reinduction therapy received Erwinase on Mondays, Wednesdays and Fridays for 3 weeks (9 x 20000 IU/m2 i.v.) instead of 4x 10 000IU/m2 of E. coli asparaginase (twice weekly for 2 weeks). Asparaginase trough activities were measured as the primary parameter, targeting 100-200 IU/I after 2 d and >50 IU/l after 3 d. Concurrently, asparagine trough concentrations were monitored. The mean trough activity was 156+/-99 IU/l, with 2/108 samples showing no detectable activity. Regarding trough levels per individual (three or more measurements/patient), means ranged from 52+/-29 to 276+/-114 IU/l (20 patients, 106 samples), with nine, six, and five children inside, below, and above the target range, respectively. The mean 3 d trough activity was 50+/-39 IU/l (20 patients, 51 samples). In 11 of these samples no activity was measurable. Mean trough activities calculated per individual ranged from < 20-84+/-30 IU/l (14 patients, 42 samples) with seven children below the target limit of 50 IU/l and asparagine concentrations <0.2 - 1.5microM. We concluded that an increased dose of 9x20000 IU/m2 of Erwinia asparaginase within 3 weeks resulted in a pharmacokinetic dose intensity comparable to former observations made with 4 x 10 000IU/m2 of the E. coli product Crasnitin which is no longer marketed. High interindividual variability and the phenomenon of 'silent' inactivation necessitate monitoring wherever possible.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10050714     DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2141.1999.01192.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Haematol        ISSN: 0007-1048            Impact factor:   6.998


  15 in total

1.  Polyethylene Glycol-conjugated L-asparaginase versus native L-asparaginase in combination with standard agents for children with acute lymphoblastic leukemia in second bone marrow relapse: a Children's Oncology Group Study (POG 8866).

Authors:  Joanne Kurtzberg; Barbara Asselin; Mark Bernstein; George R Buchanan; Brad H Pollock; Bruce M Camitta
Journal:  J Pediatr Hematol Oncol       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 1.289

2.  Higher plasma asparaginase activity after intramuscular than intravenous Erwinia asparaginase.

Authors:  John C Panetta; Yiwei Liu; Hope D Swanson; Seth E Karol; Ching-Hon Pui; Hiroto Inaba; Sima Jeha; Mary V Relling
Journal:  Pediatr Blood Cancer       Date:  2020-04-23       Impact factor: 3.167

3.  Plasma asparaginase activity and asparagine depletion in acute lymphoblastic leukemia patients treated with pegaspargase on Children's Oncology Group AALL07P4.

Authors:  Reuven J Schore; Meenakshi Devidas; Archie Bleyer; Gregory H Reaman; Naomi Winick; Mignon L Loh; Elizabeth A Raetz; William L Carroll; Stephen P Hunger; Anne L Angiolillo
Journal:  Leuk Lymphoma       Date:  2019-01-10

Review 4.  What makes a good new therapeutic L-asparaginase?

Authors:  Angela Beckett; David Gervais
Journal:  World J Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2019-09-24       Impact factor: 3.312

5.  Consensus expert recommendations for identification and management of asparaginase hypersensitivity and silent inactivation.

Authors:  Inge M van der Sluis; Lynda M Vrooman; Rob Pieters; Andre Baruchel; Gabriele Escherich; Nicholas Goulden; Veerle Mondelaers; Jose Sanchez de Toledo; Carmelo Rizzari; Lewis B Silverman; James A Whitlock
Journal:  Haematologica       Date:  2016-03       Impact factor: 9.941

6.  Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties of calaspargase pegol Escherichia coli L-asparaginase in the treatment of patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia: results from Children's Oncology Group Study AALL07P4.

Authors:  Anne L Angiolillo; Reuven J Schore; Meenakshi Devidas; Michael J Borowitz; Andrew J Carroll; Julie M Gastier-Foster; Nyla A Heerema; Taha Keilani; Ashley R Lane; Mignon L Loh; Gregory H Reaman; Peter C Adamson; Brent Wood; Charlotte Wood; Hao W Zheng; Elizabeth A Raetz; Naomi J Winick; William L Carroll; Stephen P Hunger
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2014-10-27       Impact factor: 44.544

7.  Erwinia asparaginase achieves therapeutic activity after pegaspargase allergy: a report from the Children's Oncology Group.

Authors:  Wanda L Salzer; Barbara Asselin; Jeffrey G Supko; Meenakshi Devidas; Nicole A Kaiser; Paul Plourde; Naomi J Winick; Gregory H Reaman; Elizabeth Raetz; William L Carroll; Stephen P Hunger
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2013-06-05       Impact factor: 22.113

Review 8.  Pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic relationships of asparaginase formulations: the past, the present and recommendations for the future.

Authors:  Vassilios I Avramis; Eduard H Panosyan
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 6.447

9.  Monitoring of Erwinia asparaginase therapy in childhood ALL in the Nordic countries.

Authors:  B K Albertsen; H Schrøder; P Jakobsen; H J Müller; N T Carlsen; K Schmiegelow
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 4.335

10.  Erwinia asparaginase after allergy to E. coli asparaginase in children with acute lymphoblastic leukemia.

Authors:  Lynda M Vrooman; Jeffrey G Supko; Donna S Neuberg; Barbara L Asselin; Uma H Athale; Luis Clavell; Kara M Kelly; Caroline Laverdière; Bruno Michon; Marshall Schorin; Harvey J Cohen; Stephen E Sallan; Lewis B Silverman
Journal:  Pediatr Blood Cancer       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 3.167

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.