Literature DB >> 10050639

Factors affecting the circumcision decision.

J D Tiemstra1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Studies from more than 10 years ago have shown that most parents choose circumcision for their infant sons for nonmedical reasons. Since then a wealth of data has accumulated on the relative risks and benefits of the procedure, although the medical community remains divided on the appropriateness of the procedure. Whether the ongoing research effort and medical debate have had an effect on parental decision making is unknown.
METHODS: A survey of parents of 55 male infants was conducted to determine when the parents made their decision regarding circumcision, whether discussions with providers affected their decisions, and what the reasons were for their decisions.
RESULTS: Eighty percent of parents made the circumcision decision before provider discussions. Seventeen percent reported changing their mind based on their provider's discussion, although it did not significantly affect the circumcision rate. Eighty-three percent of parents reported their provider's attitude as neutral, including 7 of 8 patients who changed their mind based on the discussion; only 1 patient was circumcised based on the provider's recommendation. Predominant reasons for circumcision were ease of hygiene (67 percent), ease of infant circumcision compared with adult circumcision (63 percent), medical benefit (41 percent), and father circumcised (37 percent). Reasons for no circumcision included unnecessary (73 percent), painful (36 percent), and father uncircumcised (18 percent).
CONCLUSIONS: Most parents have made a decision on circumcision before physicians discuss it, and physician discussions appear to have little impact on the decision. Ease of cleanliness is still the most common reason parents choose circumcision.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10050639     DOI: 10.3122/15572625-12-1-16

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Board Fam Pract        ISSN: 0893-8652


  5 in total

1.  Value judgment, harm, and religious liberty.

Authors:  A M Viens
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 2.903

2.  Attitudes and decision making about neonatal male circumcision in a Hispanic population in New York City.

Authors:  Gabriela M Bisono; Lisa Simmons; Robert J Volk; Dodi Meyer; Thomas C Quinn; Susan L Rosenthal
Journal:  Clin Pediatr (Phila)       Date:  2012-04-17       Impact factor: 1.168

Review 3.  Woman and girl-centred care for those affected by female genital mutilation: a scoping review of provider tools and guidelines.

Authors:  Angela Dawson; Anisa Assifi; Sabera Turkmani
Journal:  Reprod Health       Date:  2022-02-22       Impact factor: 3.223

4.  Parental decision making in male circumcision.

Authors:  Lauren Sardi; Kathy Livingston
Journal:  MCN Am J Matern Child Nurs       Date:  2015 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 1.412

5.  "To speak or not to speak": A qualitative analysis on the attitude and willingness of women to start conversations about voluntary medical male circumcision with their partners in a peri-urban area, South Africa.

Authors:  Candice M Chetty-Makkan; Jonathan M Grund; Reuben Munyai; Vuyokazi Gadla; Violet Chihota; Mpho Maraisane; Salome Charalambous
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-01-25       Impact factor: 3.240

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.